Shooting in Sofia – because of a dog who broke the door of a store



[ad_1]

The shooting incident in the underpbad of the boulevards "Bulgaria" and "Gotse Delchev" was due to a domestic dispute – a dog who was relieved at the door of a shop C & Is the head of the investigation department of the Chief Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Stoyno Tsvetkov, said at the extraordinary briefing

filming took about 10 hours today. According to the signal, the shooting took place in the underpbad of Bulgaria and Gotse Delchev boulevards shortly before 10 am

" There were colleagues who were alerted by citizens and heard the sound of They immediately responded, seized the aggressor a 59-year-old man, and found the victim who was a 50-year-old man, "said Tsvetkov

Rapid rescue teams were summoned to the scene and the wounded taken to a hospital where he was operated We remember earlier today from the military hospital that the injured person was operated on and resuscitated with danger to life. [19459005

" The occasion causes scandal that the victim's dog was marked his territory at the door of the author's shop ," said the head of the SDR

Regarding the information that the owner e of the dog took out a stick and the first attacked the owner of the store Tsvetkov said: "There is a stick that is seized by the accident, but we do not have the data for the l '. having fired, according to witnesses the wife of this injured victim is worn out, for fear of being hit with the dog, lest someone be bitten during a walk when he walks around his dog. "

<img src =" https://webnews.bg/uploads/images/60/9860/369860/640x.jpg?_=1532423992 "alt =" Source: Source:

] Tsvetkov added that the investigation was conducted for several hours and that the information was not definitive . The circumstances surrounding the incident are still clear

It has also become clear that all the urgent measures have been taken and the documents are reported to the Sofia City Prosecutor's Office

The current version of the shooter is not clear because it's always in question. He was allowed to possess the weapon

Tsvetkov also pointed out that the author had a criminal record in the past for bodily harm

[ad_2]
Source link