[ad_1]
ISLAMABAD: With apparently no immediate relief for members of the Sharif family, the High Court of Islamabad (IHC) adjourned on Tuesday the hearing of appeals filed by the former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz and his son. Lt. Col. Safdar against the benchmark verdict of Avenfield after the general election.
The IHC sent NAB separate opinions on Nawaz Sharif's plea to transfer the remaining corruption cases against him to another judge. as well as on the Sharif family's appeals against the Avenfield verdict. While the court has upheld the appeals of the former prime minister and his family against the Avenfield verdict, she dismissed Nawaz's request to suspend the trial of remaining bribery references until it was cleared. what the IHC decides.
Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Judge Miangul Hbadan Aurangzeb hears appeals from the Sharif family. As the hearing began on Tuesday, Nawaz's attorney, Khawaja Haris, began his arguments by stating that the liability judge had already handed down his verdict in a dismissal and that he could not so do not hear the other two references. Judge Aurangzeb asked Haris whether the judge had given an opinion on the other two references in the Avenfield judgment. Haris pointed out that it is not the judge's bias or his personal grudge, but the fairness of the trial. The court then notified the NAB attorney of Nawaz's request to transfer the remaining cases to another judge, ordering him to file a response at the next hearing scheduled for the last week of July.
The court, however, dismissed Nawaz's plea for a stay of the bribery proceedings until the court ruled on his request for the transfer of the records.
The court then began to hear the case. Call of the Sharif family against the verdict of Avenfield
. Pervaiz, the court issued notices to NAB and also asked for the full record of the trial. The court also upheld the family's Sharif appeals against the Avenfield verdict.
Haris then pleaded in court to suspend the court order until the appeals were heard. Judge Kayani noted that the NAB can receive advice on how to stay the proceedings. Haris informed the court that the Avenfield ruling states that it is normal for parents to be financially responsible for their children while NAB's star witness, Wajid Zia, admitted during cross-examination that JIT could not find no evidence that Nawaz's children were his dependents. 19659008] On Monday, the Sharif family's lawyers – who are currently serving their respective sentences in Adiala Prison – filed three separate appeals on behalf of their clients. Appeals – which highlight the legal flaws in the Avenfield judgment – demand that the verdict of the Court of Accounts be declared void and that the three convicts be released on bail
The trial against the Sharif family began on September 14, 2017 On July 6, after four extensions of the initial six-month time limit for concluding the three cases, the court announced its verdict in the Avenfield decision
The NAB court adjourns the Al-Azizia decision until ruled recourse -A5
Posted in Daily Times, July 18 th 2018.
[ad_2]
Source link
