[ad_1]
This year marks the 30th anniversary of the beginning of the panic "global warming" (now known as "climate change")
As noted by the Wall Street Journal On June 23, 1988, NASA scientist James E. Hansen testified before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and affirmed a "high degree of confidence" in "a cause-and-effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed warming "
. global importance, should be rigorously examined to see if they have come true. In the case of Hansen, it is obvious that they did not do it.
Hansen proposed three possible scenarios. We would see the temperature of the Earth rise by 1 degree Celsius here this year; the second would see a 0.7% increase in temperature, and the third would see a smaller increase that would stabilize in 2000.
The third scenario was the most accurate. Hansen has made many other predictions, including stronger hurricanes related to global surface temperatures. "The list of what has not happened," notes The Journal, "is long and tedious," adding, "… it's time to acknowledge that the rapid warming that he predicted is not climate researchers and decision-makers should adopt the most modest forecasts that are compatible with the observed temperatures. "
This will not happen because, as for the reform of Most politicians prefer the solution.Lindzen is an American atmospheric physicist known for his work on atmospheric dynamics, atmospheric tides and the photochemistry of ozone.In an interview published on wattsupwiththat. com, the website on global warming and climate change, Lindzen says:
"The unscientific proponents of climate hysteria realize that distant predictions of remote problems by inadequate models l a modern industrial society. So they are trying to say that we are seeing the problems right now. Of course, the warming that has occurred over the last 200 years has been too small to have been a major factor. However, objective reality is of little importance when it comes to propaganda – where repetition can actually counter reality.
Repetition is precisely what we live in the mainstream media, which selectively interviewed people who promote the myth of climate change. These include some politicians, who see it as another way to regulate and dominate our lives. As if to confirm this, climatedepot.com notes: "NBC News is in the process of publishing a report claiming that meteorologists support the efforts of George Mason and Climate Central to promote climate change fears over your weather forecast
by activist meteorologists is highly suspect and the groups behind the effort have supported stopping any scientific debate by supporting the RICO statutes against skeptics and they have greatly benefited from the federal funding of their efforts. "
When the hype calms down, the facts at the top In 2015, the UK's Daily Telegraph reported," Two events last week brought other twists to the One of the longest jokes of our modern world. One of them was revealed by the European Space Agency: in 2013 and 2014, after years in which the volume of Arctic ice had decreased, it has further increased by 33%. The other was that Canadian scientists studying the effects of climate change on the Arctic ice of an icebreaker had to suspend their research when their ship was called in with the help of other bady traps. in the thickest summer ice of Hudson Bay for 20 years.
Many apocalyptic predictions of an imminent end of the world because of "climate change" have proved wrong. Their goal of depriving us of more of our freedoms and spending billions of dollars to solve an invented problem was exposed
We can and should recycle and not pollute the atmosphere, water or the earth – but not lower the temperature of the Earth
[ad_2]
Source link
