[ad_1]
You've heard a lot about humans on Mars in recent years because of technological advances that could allow us to do this safely and, perhaps, to put in place some kind of regulation in the future. not so far away. . Former astronaut Chris Hadfield, a visitor to the International Space Station and one of the most prominent faces among space travelers, shocked the scientific community by claiming that NASA would have probably been able to land astronauts on Mars as early as the 1960s if they really wanted it.
<p clbad = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Hadfield, who made the request to Business Insider covers his claim by explaining that if the old NASA spacecraft could have flown to Mars and landed there, the prospects for the term survival was essentially zero. " -reactid = "19"> This statement comes with a huge asterisk. Hadfield, who claimed Business Insider claims that if the old NASA spacecraft would have flown to Mars and landed there, the prospects for long-term survival were essentially nil. 19659002]
<p clbad = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mo (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = " Don & # 39 Miss : Amazon has 5 main deals of the day and they are all bargains "data-reactid =" 22 "> Not to be missed : [19659004] Amazon has 5 main deals of the day and they are all bargains
"The technology that led us to the moon and back when I was just a kid – that technology can carry us to Mars, "Hadfield explained that the rocket technology that will take us to Mars is not so different from the vehicles that sent astronauts to the moon. However, "the majority of astronauts we send to these missions would not do it," he added.
There are a number of big problems with sending humans on Mars today, much less in the 1960s. The journey is incredibly long, and the archaic technology of the The Apollo era would not bring travelers to the planet fast enough for it to make sense to send them. It all comes down to keeping astronauts alive and healthy to keep doing their job, and a slow ship on its way to Mars is a recipe for disaster.
Many different things could end the mission prematurely, including the disease in space. The radiation of deep space is a real concern for space agencies who dream of a mission on inhabited Mars, and the spaceship of the past was simply not equipped with the type of equipment needed to mitigate it. A 1960s Mars mission could have badembled the crew in one piece, but they would not have lasted long, and bringing them back to Earth in a healthy state would have been virtually impossible.
<h4 clbad = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Related video: "data-reactid =" 26 "> Related Video:
<p clbad = "canvas-atom-canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = " For more information new videos visit Yahoo View [19659011] "data-reactid =" 29 "> For more new videos visit Yahoo View .
<p clbad = "web-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mo (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = " BGR Top of the offers: "data-reactid =" 30 "> BGR Top Specials:
- Amazon has 5 main deals of the day and these are all bargains
- Amazon's Top 5 Deals of the Day of tuesday
<p clbad = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mo (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = " Trend at the # Current time: "data-reactid =" 34 "> Trend now:
- Exclusive: Apple deploys 1Pbadword to all 123,000 employees, acquisition negotiations are under way [19659023] Photos show what happens when a Lamborghini plants in the parked Honda Civic
- The new Google Pixel 2 XL offer makes it difficult to wait for the Pixel 3
<p clbad = "canvas- atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mo (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm " type = "text" content = " View the original version of this article on BGR.com " data-reactid = "39"> See the original final version of this article on BGR .com
Source link
