[ad_1]
Casey Ward | United States
"We live in a society extremely dependent on science and technology, in which almost nobody knows anything about science and technology." – Carl Sagan
The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space of the United States (COPUS) has written many laws and treaties, but all they do, is show how governments poorly understand the space. Although the intentions are generally well-intentioned, such as Articles I and II stating that space is free for the exploration of all nations and that space objects should be used exclusively for peaceful purposes. Article IV also states that no weapons of mbad destruction are allowed in outer space. Even though they are well-intentioned, these treatises ignore basic science and we can see it with a grain of sand and some calculations. Theoretically, a grain of sand could destroy the Earth if you put 2.23 × 10 ^ 34 watts of energy, this would be enough to create an explosion of 2.24 × 10 ^ 32 Joules, equivalent to about 6 612 Tsar bomba, the largest nuclear bomb ever built. Of course, it's almost impossible, but the science is clear: the force is equal to the mbad multiplied by the acceleration. Thus, any object or ship could be destroyed in a mbadive way if it hit the Earth.
Any law is arbitrary and defined in terms of popular opinion, which becomes even more difficult with larger populations. In addition, space exacerbates the cultural and legal problems we are already facing. An important part of the law concerns enforceability, the large void of space making it pointless to look for someone to chase someone, for example, a settler on the moon has "illegal" drugs ". Attempting to regulate a society around or even outside our solar system, with the estimation of the population of humanity and the area we inhabit, the future of legal systems seems uncertain. Today we have a complex and confusing legal code. In the near future, this must be simplified so that humanity keeps all resemblance to a coherent culture.
The space presents a great opportunity for human expansion. Space prevents you from governing someone because it is useless to write a law for someone you could never reach in your lifetime, or theirs. If we badume that humans will continue to develop a life extension technology, they could simply run indefinitely, as previously stated. In addition, society would evolve at different rates and in different directions, which would further complicate the task of politicians to legislate, because they can neither prohibit nor prohibit. Who would then bear the high cost of colonizing planets or creating rotating habitats? In the past and even today, it is the responsibility of governments, but more and more private companies are turning to the sky. SpaceX is most notable with its plan to arrive on Mars from 2022 and for people to colonize the red planet by 2028. Other important space companies are Virgin Galactic, which is attempting to build a fleet of spacecraft, Obayashi Corporation, which has launched two satellites for the space elevator that they are trying to design by 2030, and Planetary Resources, which plans asteroid extraction missions. At first glance, it is better for the future to be left to the free market to colonize space, and rightly so.
Even Amazon's Jeff Bezos is embarking on the race with his Blue Origin company, but he is also planning a population of more than 1,000,000,000 people in the near future comparing the race of the private space to the explosion of Internet. And just like the Internet, the government launched an experiment, but as soon as the free market settled in, it exploded with innovation, wealth creation and, most importantly, improvement of people's lives.
Get great merchandise. Help 71 Republic to end the media oligarchy. Make a donation today to our Patreon, which you can find right here. Thank you very much for your support!
Source of the selected image
Source link
