[ad_1]
Author Steven Galloway was at the head of the UBC Creative Writing Department before being suspended without pay in November 2015 and returned several months later
Jason Payne / PROVINCE Vancouver Sun
As Steven Galloway broke his silence Friday on the allegations that devastated his career, the University of British Columbia In a statement, the Vice President of Foreign Relations of The University of British Columbia, Philip Steenkamp, has stated that recent articles on Galloway's treatment of the Galloway investigation by the University of British Columbia [traduction] "denigrate the situation ". But the university supported its decision to send the author back to the head of the university's creative writing department, but she remained bound by the privacy laws and could not disclose the reasons.
In June, an arbitrator determined that UBC was to pay Galloway $ 167,000 after "some communications" from the university breached Galloway's privacy and damaged his reputation
UBC suspended Galloway without pay in November 2015. "Allegations made to the University's Creative Writing Department." The allegations were not revealed at that time, but rumor had it that they included badual badault, harbadment and intimidation.
Independent Investigation by BC Retired Supreme Court Justice Mary Ellen Boyd, found that the allegation of badual badault was unfounded, but found that he had had a two-year affair with a student, which was contrary to the policy of the University of British Columbia 2016 for breach of trust
The UBC Teachers' Association filed grievances against the university for violation of the author's privacy rights, which caused him irreparable harm to the reputation and financial losses.
for Galloway to be reinstated as well as claims for compensation for loss of income and benefits. The question of whether UBC had to fire Galloway was also removed from arbitration
The arbitrator stated that a third party determination of the remaining issues is still necessary. The faculty badociation did not respond to an interview request
In an interview, Steenkamp stated that he was confident that UBC followed the proper process and took the good decision when he shot Galloway. Allegations of badual misconduct were not the only issues examined by the university during its review of his employment
Steenkamp could not say what other issues were being examined.
"Everything was together," he said.
At the time of Galloway's dismissal, UBC cited "a record of misconduct that resulted in an irreparable breach of trust placed in faculty members."
In a first-person article published Friday in the National Post, Galloway said: "
He stated that" all women should be listened to and all complaints and accusations should be the subject of a thorough and fair inquiry, "was he warned. "Listen, as the default position, should not mean that any accused is automatically, irrevocably guilty."
"This is not true that 100% of badault allegations are true , though certainly, "he wrote, before repeating some of the charges against him, including the moment he" handcuffed "a woman in a joke between them
. In the article, Galloway said seven people have filed complaints against him, in addition to the main complainant.
19659004] "I will never understand how they were able to do what they did … … If they have injuries, their injuries are self-inflicted."
Postmedia reached out to one of the complainants for comment, but has not received any response. Galloway also declined to comment on this article, preferring to let his editorial in the first person speak for itself. He also declined to share Boyd's report, which the UBC can not share for privacy reasons.
In his statement, Steenkamp stated that the situation was "difficult, sensitive and complex."
the right balance between the right to privacy of those concerned and the demands of ever greater transparency. The faculty and staff involved in the management of this case were professionals and principles in all their transactions and were guided by the relevant policies and prescribed processes. The characterizations according to which these professors and staff members engaged in an imperfect process, or innuendo that they had ulterior motives, are simply false. "
– with files by Derrick Penner
[ad_2]
Source link
