You said it: another scandalous Liberal gesture



[ad_1]

Another extraterrestrial movement

Re: $ 6.3 billion in loans? Federal government delivers documents to businesses, October 23

We are seeing the most fiscally irresponsible federal government since the first Trudeau government. Not only has it kept its election promise to create a "modest" deficit, now reaching $ 19 billion and increasing, while adding $ 100 billion to the national debt, but also the well-being of businesses.

He has generously "lent" $ 372 million to Bombardier, which will probably never be repaid, and this outrageous move is to simply write off billions of dollars in Canadian taxes. It is time to put an end to the well-being of companies and not to continue to bail out and, therefore, to reward poorly managed companies.

LARRY COMEAU

OTTAWA

(Well said.)

BILLION TRUDEAU

Re: $ 6.3 billion in loans? Federal government delivers documents to businesses, October 23

That's not to say $ 6.3 billion … no banker or average person would ever be employed if he lost $ 6,300 to his job.

That's $ 6,300,000,000 … !! Little does it matter whether it's the Harper government or Trudeau Jr. While everything from Phoenix to billions of dollars is regularly spent in the bathroom while average Canadians pay more and more taxes Every year, why do not we fall on Parliament Hill?

Why do these yahoos who collect gold pensions work for corporate interests such as Chrysler and do not do anything for taxpayers? Really!

Y W KAM

OTTAWA

(We agree, fiscal responsibility is not about partisan politics, it's about the future of our country.)

COW TAX?

I think I remember reading a few years ago that methane emitted by cows was considered a major contributor to the greenhouse effect and climate change. I wonder if Prime Ministers Trudeau et al. Have considered imposing a "cow fathers tax" on Canadian citizens.

Consumers would pay a revenue-neutral tax on any beef-related product that would be refunded to them at the time of the tax return. Of course, the federal bureaucracy would take its 10% discount on processing fees before sending the rebates.

Just think that this tax could be extended to pigs, chickens, lambs, capons … the list (and income) is infinite.

DAVID MARSHALL

OTTAWA

(That would be a gas, okay.)

TAX ON POT POLLUTION?

So now, Trudeau calls it a tax on pollution rather than a carbon tax. Will he slap a tax on all the pollution of his pot?

TERRY TOLL

CAMPBELL'S BAY, QUE.

(Cough, cough, we think no.)

SANDY REALLY BLUE FOR HIM

Re: More news than Pot News, October 23rd letter

Congratulations to Sandy Johnston for his letter on gooey sockboy. I would not have said better myself. This idiot is determined to ruin our country and our economy. Start it!

DAVE SKEAD

OTTAWA

(Voters will have a say next year, we'll see what they decide.)

ECONOMIC TAX DISCOUNT POOR

The carbon tax rebate that the Trudeau government plans to give to Canadians each spring is an extremely poor economy and is simply a corruption. It looks like the child who does not want to take his horrible medication, but is offered an ice cream if he does.

Less taxes on goods and services, especially for energy products such as vehicle filling and family home heating, allow people to have more capital in their pockets all year round to use at home. other purposes throughout the year.

A one-off rebate in the hands of many people means that everything is fine in one go, and I guess many of them will expect their money to go back into the coffers of the state.

STEPHEN FLANAGAN

OTTAWA

(We will not be talking about giving money back to taxpayers, but that does not mean that the carbon tax is the best way to do it.)

[ad_2]
Source link