[ad_1]
Ignacio Sánchez, rector of the Catholic University, raised his voice to question the new protocol of conscientious objection presented by the Government stating that he did not exclude not resort to the Constitutional Court (TC) to annul it
. In an interview with La Tercera, Sánchez argued that "I attribute this to the fact that the government wants to be completely in line with the directives issued by the comptroller's office, but there is no conviction behind him. " That to say that the controller's instructions are correct, but that the regulation must have aspects that a government considers important to the people and their property. "
Sánchez fired that " the government does not make regulation is adjusted to the well-being of people, and it seems serious that I do not have that look of common good, but only to avoid problems with the controller. "
That's why the rector of UC slipped that could" We think the institutional objection is enshrined in the law saying that the institution can, according to its own ideology, to be an object of conscience, with all the necessary means to obtain a modification of the rules. "
mechanism in this respect. Public funds can not be at the discretion of the state, they are generated by all Chileans and must be directed to projects of public good, "he explained.
The rector reiterated that "it is not the spirit of the law that a regulation begins to place restrictions on a right." It is unconstitutional to deny a fundamental right by a regulation The fundamental right that the law promotes is the objection of the institutions, and this regulation delimits and denies that right by putting conditions in. It is unconstitutional. "
[ad_2]
Source link
