[ad_1]
The ex-partner Natalia Companion in Caval, Mauricio Valero testified in the court of Rancagua, in the trial where both are imputed.
There was a ban on forwarding or recording the hearing. However, the Judiciary has facilitated the audio, where the defendant told how the company was created, how he met his partner and the origins of the purchase and sale of millionaire land in Machalí .
On this case, Valero said that of the 44 hectares, Caval was interested only in four, which were the urban properties, to build a service station and that had never intended to buy and sell quickly . He also badured that the Bank of Chile knew that it was a safe business and that it was earning around $ 150 million in interest, with the credit that it facilitated.
https://media.biobiochile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/6-cu-caval-valero-1.mp3
Leaving the court, Valero insisted that was not guilty of corruption although he acknowledged a "disorder" tax, which are the crimes attributed to him by the public prosecutor.
https://media.biobiochile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/6-cu-caval-valero-2.mp3On the last day of this oral test which started on 11 En June, Sebastian Dávalos attended, to accompany his wife.
At the end of the hearing, the son of President Michelle Bachelet warned that would continue to file a complaint against those who reproached him with the present Labor Minister, Nicolás Monckeberg.
https://media.biobiochile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/6-cu-caval-davalos.mp3For next Friday, the Audition of reformation of Dávalos, his wife and Valero for alleged violation of the Intellectual Property Law, for possible plagiarism of three reports Cochilco, sold to businessman Gonzalo Vial Concha, who sued for fraud.
The daughter-in-law of ex-president Michelle Bachelet will declare Monday her lawsuit against her, in the main edge of the case Caval
This article describes an ongoing judicial process
It is possible that the charges may be dismissed at the end of the investigation, so the defendant should NOT be considered guilty until Justice makes a judgment against him
] (Article 04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure)
[ad_2]
Source link