[ad_1]
A study conducted by Yale University researchers on people with cancer and published in the journal JAMA Oncology, led to abysmal differences between patients who decided to treat with "traditional medicine" and those who opted for "complementary medicine."
Over a seven-year period, physicians followed a total of 1,290 people diagnosed with colorectal cancer, bad, prostate and prostate cancer. lung, notes The Telegraph.
"1032 conventional therapies used", such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, and a total of 258 were treated with complementary drugs.
After the established period, Study found that 85% of patients used treatments the traditions survived, compared with 70% survival who opted for alternative treatments.
By the way, research showed that those who used both types of "drugs" did not work better than those who were only treated with traditional methods.
Dr. Skyler Johnson, one of the authors of the study, said that these data should make professionals who offer alternative treatments and patients who use them discontinue this type of practice and note that "There is a lot of confusion about the role of complementary therapies".
Johnson reports that "complementary medicine" can help patients "who have symptoms of cancer treatment" but who appear to be marketed or understood by patients as "effective cancer treatments".
[ad_2]
Source link
