[ad_1]
The possible legal redefinition of the genre of a person in the United States has aroused great anger.
Politicians, prominent figures and human rights groups have reacted against a press report that the Donald Trump government would use to change its policy on gender recognition [19659003] According to the newspaper of the New York Times a White House memorandum proposes to legally define the gender of a person by his biological bad [19659004] at birth .
This amendment would cancel the current policy that facilitates transgender recognition.
The government of former President Barack Obama adopted a definition of gender in federal politics that more easily allowed individual choice and self-determination.
This change has resulted in a series of legal challenges that have lasted for many months in serving States.
This affects things as practical as toilet use.
The Trump government had already tried to reduce the recognition of transgender people in the military and schools.
Activists fear that the changes they propose to define as "19459009" "nonexistent" Americans who currently identify as transgender a community whose number of inhabitants would be d & # 39; at least 1.4 million.
transgendered and non-baded people shared their personal stories and their response to the report using the hashtag #WeWontBeErased
or " They Will not Blot Us ".
What changes are proposed?
The report of the New York Times on Sunday quotes a memorandum from the Department of Health and Social Services (HHS, for its acronym). English). [19659003] He proposes to establish a single legal definition of bad under Title IX, a federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination between men and women.
HHS argues that the current lack of clarity has allowed the protection of civil rights. wrongly applied to some people since the Obama administration.
The proposed change would mean on the contrary that the bad of persons would be legally fixed from birth as a man or woman for their badia
"Sex means the status of a person as a man or woman based on identifiable immutable biological traits during or before birth, "according to the newspaper, HHS, quoted in the note.
the bad that appears on the birth certificate of a person as it was originally issued will constitute definitive proof of the bad of 39, a person, unless denied by reliable genetic testing, "he adds.
The Department of Health and Human Services told the US media that he would not comment on alleged leaks
The Wall Street Journal also reported that HHS officials are hoping to change the standard, but internal disputes keep us from knowing how much it will be extended.
What was the reaction?
The report has angered some people inside and outside the United States, mainly from the LGBT community.
In a series of messages Sunday Twitter the National Center for Equality Tran sgenres described the possible changes as an "abomination" and "a reckless attack" on the lives of transgender people.
"We are not going anywhere … People trans can not be deleted with a memo Post a selfie Call a friend Attend our meeting tomorrow. All to show them that #WeWontBeEreReased, "said the organization.
The Human Rights Campaign, one of the leading LGBT rights groups in the United States, said the change would be a "destructive precedent".
"Defining" bad "in this narrow language adapted to the opposing points of contention of extremists against equality is part of a deliberate strategy to eliminate federal protections granted to LGBTQ people" said its president, Chad Griffin.
Members of the transgender community used social networks to protest the proposition through personal stories and selfies using #WeWontBeErased .
Transgender actress and activist Laverne Cox shared The New York Times on Twitter and added a comment: " We should not give up. But before this affront to my existence and to the existence of my community, I have chosen love, not fear.We exist and we have always existed. "
Hollywood actress Susan Sarandon and the star of Queer Eye, Jonathan van Ness, were also among the people who declared that "the rights trans are human rights". [19659003] Political figures such as Senator Bernie Sanders and President Bill Clinton's daughter Chelsea Clinton also condemned the proposed amendments.
[ad_2]
Source link
