Camera approves Aula Segura and is ready to become law «Diario y Radio U Chile

At an extraordinary session, the Chamber of Deputies approved the controversial Convivencia Escolar project -ex Safe Clbadroom- with 110 votes in favor, 26 against and 13 abstentions. The law authorizes school directors to initiate procedures for the expulsion of pupils when they seriously undermine coexistence in schools, in particular by carrying weapons, badual badault, serious bodily and psychological injuries. members of the community or third parties, as well as property damage. infrastructure of the establishment.

Cristina Girardi, Member of Parliament for PPD, questioned the need for such regulations, considering that measures such as expulsion have shown that they are not a solution to the problems from the community.

"Why expulsion, which is the focus of this project, which is a measure that already exists today in our legislation, has not solved the problems of violence In addition, they only aggravated the problems and the level of violence.

In the weeks leading up to his vote in Sala, the government took several steps to avoid the problem.

In this sense, a key vote was that of the MP for DC, Mario Venegas, who withdrew certain indications that he had presented himself. , while in others, he had chosen to abstain.

Meanwhile, during the debate at Sala, the parliamentarian defended the initiative in ensuring that the text is completely different from the original.

"In reality, the initial project had problems, procedural problems, which are basic principles, m But the question is: the project we have today Is voting the wrong project that started? No, clearly not "sentenced."

For her part, the autonomous leftist and Education Committee member Camila Rojas, recalled that the opposition had presented a set of He also pointed out that the problem of extreme violence would not put an end to this law and would have no effect on the coexistence of educational communities.

"The government was mean. It could have approved a coherent project providing for the contributions of the House Education Committee, but that was not the case and we will have a harmless and incoherent law that will not solve the problems outlined here. Salary breaks say, at the point of expulsion of the ministers' violence, where is the education? The educational problems of the country are numerous and have been growing for years, public education being the main victim. "

Since student organizations categorically rejected the government's proposal, in the hours leading up to the vote, Aces spokeswoman Amanda Luna called for disobedience to the project. he was approved. "The terror campaign that installed the government to validate the legitimacy of Safe Clbadroom shows that it is not an educational policy, but a repressive policy ", said the leader.

In an extraordinary session, the Chamber of Deputies approved the controversial project of Convivencia Escolar -ex Safe Clbadroom- by 110 votes for, 26 against and 13 abstentions

The law authorizes the directors of Establishment to initiate processes of student expulsion when they seriously undermine school coexistence, by carrying weapons, badual badault, serious physical and mental harm to members of the community or to ti ers, as well as damage to the infrastructure of the establishment.

PPD MP Cristina Girardi questioned the need for a settlement of these features, given that measures such as expulsion have shown that they do not constitute a solution to the problems of the community

"Why expulsion, which is the axis of this project, already existing measure in our legislation, has not solved the problems of the In addition, they only worsened the problems and the level of violence.

In the weeks leading up to his vote in Sala, the government took several steps to avoid the violence.

In this sense, a key vote was that of the MP for DC, Mario Venegas, who withdrew certain indications that he had presented to him. even, while in others, he had chosen to abstain.

Meanwhile, during the discussion at Sala, the The parliamentarian defended the initiative by ensuring that the text is completely different from the original.

"In reality, the original project had problems, procedural problems, which are basic principles, but the question is: the project we have today. Is voting the wrong project? who started? No, clearly not "sentenced.

For her part, the deputy of the autonomous left and member of the commission of Education, Camila Rojas, recalled that the opposition had presented a set of clues that had been rejected. by the executive. He also stressed that the problem of extreme violence would not end this law and would have no effect on the coexistence of educational communities.

"The government was mean.It could have approved a coherent project providing for the contributions of the House Education Committee, but this was not the case and we will have a harmless and inconsistent law. that will not solve the problems presented here.The pay breaks say, at the point of expulsion of the ministers' violence, where is the education? The educational problems of the country are numerous and are growing for years, public education is the main victim. "

Since student organizations categorically rejected the government's proposal. During the hours leading up to the vote, Ace spokeswoman Amanda Luna called for disobedience to the project when it was approved. "The terror campaign that has installed the government to validate the legitimacy of Safe Clbadroom shows that it is not an educational policy, but a repressive policy," he said. the manager.

In extraordinary session, the Chamber of Deputies approved the controversial project of Convivencia Escolar -ex Safe Clbadroom- by 110 votes for, 26 against and 13 abstentions

The law authorizes the directors of schools to initiate the process of expelling students when they seriously impair school coexistence, carrying weapons, badual badault, serious physical and mental harm to community members or third parties, and damage to the infrastructure of the establishment.

PPD MP Cristina Girardi questioned the need for a settlement of these features, given that measures such as expulsion have shown that they do not constitute a solution to the problems of the community

"Why expulsion, which is the axis of this project, already existing measure in our legislation, has not solved the problems of the In addition, they only worsened the problems and the level of violence.

In the weeks leading up to his vote in Sala, the government took several steps to avoid the violence.

In this sense, a key vote was that of the MP for DC, Mario Venegas, who withdrew certain indications that he had presented to him. even, while in others, he had chosen to abstain.

The parliamentarian defended the initiative in s & # 39; 39 ensuring that the text is completely different from the original.

"In reality, the original project had problems, procedural problems, which are basic principles, but the question is: the project we have today. Is voting the wrong project? who started? No, clearly not "sentenced.

For her part, the deputy of the autonomous left and member of the commission of Education, Camila Rojas, recalled that the opposition had presented a set of clues that had been rejected. by the executive. He also stressed that the problem of extreme violence would not end this law and would have no effect on the coexistence of educational communities.

"The government was mean.It could have approved a coherent project providing for the contributions of the House Education Committee, but this was not the case and we will have a harmless and inconsistent law. that will not solve the problems presented here.The pay breaks say, at the point of expulsion of the ministers' violence, where is the education? The educational problems of the country are numerous and are growing for years, public education is the main victim. "

Since student organizations categorically rejected the government's proposal. During the hours leading up to the vote, Ace spokeswoman Amanda Luna called for disobedience to the project when it was approved. "The terror campaign that has installed the government to validate the legitimacy of Safe Clbadroom shows that it is not an educational policy, but a repressive policy," he said. the head of government.