Bachelet's undersecretary reportedly lost more than $ 122 billion – El Repúblico



[ad_1]

The funds were intended for the citizens' security plan

Among the benches of the old new majority, only Camila Vallejo was available to comment on the research.

Editorial Staff • 01/08/2018

Have you seen a briefcase with billions of pesos inside? If so, you have to call the comptroller's office because he does not know where $ 122.3 billion is, money for security for all, a plan for the under-secretariat for crime prevention that was set up the government of President Michelle Bachelet

Last night, Chilevisión revealed that precisely during this period, between 2014 and 2017, the monitoring body detected a series of irregularities in the management of resources and budget "Security for all". In addition, he confirmed "the lack of an instrument to measure the degree of compliance with each objective set out in the National Plan of Public Safety and Prevention of Violence and Crime".

On the other hand, "I did not have documentation that reported on the detailed progress of the plan." And as if that was not enough, "it is obvious that the audited service does not have any documentation who reports on the detailed progress of 16 of the 27 total targets, representing a default of 59.23% of the total. "19659007] A" payroll "? [19659007] Consulted on the foregoing, the pro-government MPs who make up the House's Citizen Security Committee badured that the said Under-Secretariat was a "pay box" of political favors. Secretary for Crime Prevention between 2014 and 2016, argued that "political favors are paid throughout the state apparatus, I can not be held responsible for a political system that distributes the charges. "

" I had the opportunity to correct things, m But not all the things I wanted and it would happen to any undersecretary. "

The above-mentioned media tried to get statements from parliamentarians of the old majority. there was none other than Vice President Camila Vallejo, who said: "There is an inefficiency that leads to a brutal uncertainty whether it is satisfied or not" with the objectives, because we do not know if the objectives were reached he wonders what is the money for. "

[ad_2]
Source link