[ad_1]
Just before the start of the session in the Chamber of Deputies, parliamentarians Carmen Hertz (PC) and Camila Flores (RN) embraced warmly, leaving aside, at least in appearance, the conflict that shook them in the Last Days
Hertz had warned against filing lawsuits against his national revival couple, having indicated in a televised space that he had called the armed struggle during the dictatorship of # 39; Augusto Pinochet.
"I did not intend to insult or undermine anyone, I formulated political criticism in accordance with the content and format of the debate," Flores said in his defense.
He added that despite the political differences between the two, "I must stress that I personally spoke with the MP and that I insisted that there was no difference between the two. the spirit of insult or discredit (…) that was so clear in our frank, sincere and respectful conversation yesterday between the two. "
Flores said," I think it's important to clarify this clarification in order to avoid any misunderstanding or any question affecting the relations of harmony and mutual respect. "
In politics, we must defend the principles and values with strength and conviction, without complexes nor fears, like MP Hertz from his area and me from mine. We live in a pluralistic society that demands a democratic common life, a common minimum and that this common minimum constitutes fundamental rights. His first ethical standard is the tolerance that is sorely lacking in the public conversation of our country, "he added.
For his part, Hertz reacted by announcing that he would not file a complaint against Flores.
<! – Download attached document for this news ->
[ad_2]
Source link
