Confounding Amazon Facial Recognition to Congressmen with Police Suspects

Business



[ad_1]

Confounding Amazon Face Recognition to Congressmen with Police Suspects "title =" Confluence Amazon Facial Recognition to Congressmen with Police Suspects "/> </div> <p> The American Union of Civil Liberties (</p></div> <p> <strong> ACLU </strong> tested the Amazon facial recognition system <strong> </strong> and the results were surprising: the organization scanned the face of the 535 members of the Amazon Rekognition program The US Congress and confronted him 25,000 public photographs of police suspects. <strong> system </strong> confused 28 members of Congress with possible criminals, this finding, states <strong> ACLU </strong> shows <strong> danger </strong> of which the <strong> official bodies </strong> use this type of technology </p> <p> "That an identification is accurate or can not cost a person ertad or even his life", explains the <strong> ACLU </strong> in a statement. This system <strong> </strong> facial recognition, according to the organization, is already used by some institutions. For example, a police department in Orlando used it in a pilot test. "Congress must take these threats seriously, put a brake on law enforcement for facial recognition," he said. </p> <p> An Amazonian spokesman attributed the bad results to a bad calibration of <strong> system </strong> according to the newspaper specializing in The Verge technology. The tests carried out by <strong> ACLU </strong> were carried out with the confidence threshold predetermined by the program, which is 80%. But the company recommends that <strong> official bodies </strong> such as the government or the police use a 95% threshold, since the consequences of an error can be serious: "An identification could cost the people their freedom. </p> <p> "Although 80% confidence is an acceptable threshold for photos of hot dogs, chairs, animals or other cases in social networks, it would not be appropriate to identify individuals with a reasonable level of certainty". half of the spokesperson. However, the program does not recommend at the time of configuration that the threshold be 95% and nothing prevents these organizations from using the default configuration, according to The Verge. </p> <blockquote clbad=

Amazon facial recognition confused 28 congressmen with criminals

The nonprofit American Union for Civil Liberties (ACLU) has tested Amazon's facial recognition technology, Rekognition. #jimmyrosario #hablandoendigitos pic.twitter.com/azHboxp2fN

– Jimmy Rosario B. (@rosariojimmy) On July 27, 2018

The test performed by the ] ACLU also highlights the threat that the system of the Amazon may pose to blacks. Nearly 40% of the mismatches in this badysis were color photographs, even though they represent only 20% of the members of Congress.

The recognition of Amazon was already controversial in May, when a report of ACLU determined that the system was used by various official bodies. The Orlando police, according to the badociation, used a pilot program that used this system in real time. The program is very economical, since it has a cost of $ 12 a month – about $ 10 – for an entire department.

[ad_2]
Source link

Tags

Powered by https://naaju.com/chile | Designed by Naaju
© Copyright 2024, All Rights Reserved