The war for the best image quality is more interesting than ever. After the great superiority of the best plasma version compared to the LCDs of the time, the present brought us another fight that many did not expect anymore at this point. 2 or 3 years ago, it was not hard to think that at this point, saving the price, OLED technology would be the absolute market leader when a high-end television would be spoken, but the great innovation that has occurred The LCD field has considerably balanced the balance . And that is the television we are badyzing today, the Samsung QLED Q9FN of 65 inches.

Last year, we had the opportunity to test the Samsung QLED Q7F, and the impressions it left us after five months, and finally after almost a year. use was very good, but always left mixed feelings. As a user, I was aware of being in front of a high end TV, not very upscale, but despite everything, its high price made me think that I had to offer more. I also came to the conclusion that reaching 65 inches still makes the price much more expensive, but the quality has suffered a lot in the manipulation of light, and therefore in the representation of black . Samsung has succeeded in virtually everything, but the bloom has hindered the experience.

The body of the Samsung QLED Q9FN

An obsession of TV manufacturers has always been towards sets each time more end something that in many cases is appreciated, but in others it does not make much sense, considering what is lost. Normally, I've always thought that making them thicker could bring big gains in the sound, which means that they do not value the fact that they're fine except in extreme cases such than LG Wallpaper. With QLED Q9FN from Samsung we find a thicker TV than the previous generation, and far from sorry, we have to celebrate .

Samsung has finally brought back the lighting system Full Array Local Dimming which was already present in the SUHD family, and of course, In front of a lateral lighting system with side lighting (which we criticized a lot last year), the need for rear space increases a lot. The QLED Q9FN only is thicker in comparison but not when it is seen with the naked eye. We must repeat it more to the manufacturers, we prefer the thickness to the sacrifices, especially when the iamgen and the sound improve.

I like the design more than the previous . The lines are more straight and that, for me, adds a point of elegance. The fact that the television is darker certainly contributes to that. The base is black, and is more sober (although brighter) than the previous, while being more straight. This is not something that should be conditioned, since Samsung's offer is to expand, and it is still possible to hang up TV if there is room.

The system that Samsung released last year with the cable and receiver One Connect was one of the iconic spots of the previous generation. Thank you to remove the TV connections and place them in a kind of external decoder, we did not get rid of the cables, at least visually, because the idea is to hide everything, up to 15 meters from the TV.

The only thing you see behind Samsung's QLED Q9FN is this. Elegance

In QLED Q7F of 2017 there was a minor problem, but inconsistent with the idea: the fact that if you had a power cable of any TV you would go to two one for the TV itself and another for the One Connect. It seemed difficult that it could be otherwise, but Samsung succeeded. Samsung's QLED Q9FN now comes in a single cable, bigger than the one from the previous year which makes it able to flow and only needs a cable from In the box One Login. Another case where gaining thickness, comfort is gained.

The box One Connect has also grown a lot to accommodate a more powerful AC adapter, and this can be annoying, as you may need more A piece of furniture longer or wider to store it. The heat generated is high again because all connections are managed and everything that needs to be sent to the panel is processed.

The command, for uses of today, in which it is rarely altered a lot of channel with figures, it is very comfortable . The only drawback is that in applications such as Netflix or Youtube, you can not advance in playback with a pointer, being forced to do FF very slowly. The construction is still good and the voice recognition, still very perfectible, is now more accurate. Its star function, without a doubt, is the power to control non Samsung devices but in this case I did not have any other devices.

It is also part of designing, or at least wanting to improve, the new mode Ambient Mode that we will see later in the software

Samsung QLED Q9FN, this year yes

This year we offered to try the QLED Q9FN from Samsung, a much bigger jump than the 7 to 9 step could make you think. Even before its previous generation of higher range, this TV is a before-after Samsung.

On the one hand, we retain all the good of the previous TV . Brightness is still one of the highest on the market, which, combined with a large anti-glare layer, allows QLED Q9FN to be viewed without any problems in virtually every situation, which OLEDs can not say for the moment in environments very bright, or except not with this facility. The management of the brightness of the environment usually works pretty well and I have rarely had to manually adjust, whereas last year I had a problem at night, when the content was sometimes boring.

For color representation, the television continues at a high level, improving on the above and reaching 100% of the most common DCI-P3 color spectrum currently in HDR content. Regarding, what to say. We always say that it is the most important progress in image quality in recent years, even above what the 4K provides, and this is not unreasonable.

The QLED Q9FN from Samsung is great for the sport, but it misses More offer in 4K

Through a VPN, I could see something of the 2018 World Cup in Russia in 4K thanks to the broadcast of the BBC, and although there are still things to settle, HDR HLG, it changed the rules of the game. In football, it is very common to see overexposure, given the great contrasts between shadows and lights in the stadium, dark and light shirts, etc. In Mediaset's broadcast in TDT, Samsung's QLED Q9FN does a good job of scaling but the quality of the source leaves something to be desired. In addition to little details, it is observed, segúna. the time at which the game is played, a whole burning stage, even shirts of players who are not distinguished. This is common to any television.

With the broadcast in HDR, however, everything is perfectly balanced in terms of exposure, in which it is the first advantage that has always been defended by technology . The second, the wide range of colors that allows, with which it is possible to reproduce a color spectrum 26% wider than the clbadic sRGB / Rec.709. If we move to the Rec.2020, the advantage is 37%. What is sad is that in 2018 there is no support in Spain, even if it is paid, which allows us to enjoy the World Cup as it is played. In other editions, for example, it was possible to enjoy the 3D

Planet Earth II brings out all the brightness of the Samsung Star TV.

Finally, we come to the most important thing, the management of blacks. Samsung has shown a disturbing stagnation in this area for several years, with all its competitors adopting OLED or LCD with Full Array Local Dimming for less price. There was little hope that the situation would be reversed, but with the Samsung QLED Q9FN a zone lighting system was implemented (we are talking about more than 400) that offers performance spectacular . Obviously, we can not talk about pixel level control as in OLED, but at least blooming has been reduced to its maximum expression. There are no pronounced halos or bands, and the clouds have been reduced to infinity.