Fund A will close the month of July with the highest return since March 2017

In July – with quota values ​​up to 25 – positive results are observed for all multifunds, especially those most exposed to equities, according to a report prepared by Ciedess.

The most risky funds, Type A and B, recorded increases of 3.66% and 2.86%, respectively, while the moderate risk fund, type C, shows a variation of 2.11%.

In January of this year, Fondo A rented 3.91% and according to the forecasts of Ciedess, the yield of this fund would exceed that of January in July, the highest figure since March 2017, when he rented 5.38%.

therefore, the most conservative funds obtain positive results, namely 1.37% for type D and 0.55% for type E.

The monthly result of Finally, A, B and C s This is mainly due to the return on equity investments both domestically and internationally, while the change in the peso against the dollar mainly affects the higher risk funds (types A and B).

On the other hand, the profitability of the most conservative funds – types D and E – is explained by the results of investments in local debt securities and foreign fixed income instruments.

Fondo E leads profitability from January to July

So far this year, from January to July, positive results are observed for all multifunds. The riskiest funds, Types A and B, recorded respective increases of 0.86% and 1.13%, while the Moderate Risk Fund, Type C, showed a variation of 1.31%.

the most conservative funds obtained positive results, namely 1.41% for type D and 2.06% for type E.

At the same time, during the last 12 months, positive results have been obtained. also been observed for multifondos. Recorded returns of type A and B were 3.59% and 2.95% respectively, while the moderate risk fund, type C, showed a variation of 1.93%.

For its part, the Conservatives obtained positive results, namely 1.00% for type D and 1.36% for type E.

Since its creation in September 2002, multifonds have posted real returns very positive, rising from an annual 3.72% in the case of the E, which increases as the exposure in equity instruments increases.

In this way, fund D achieved an annual rate of 4.37%; Fund C had real annual growth of 4.98%; Fund B – the one with the largest number of affiliates – rented 5.52% and Fund A, with more holdings, generated a real annual return of 6.53%.