[ad_1]
It will not take long for you to find on the Web the benefits that the ruling party has attributed to Latacunga Prison. Inaugurated in March 2014, the Liberty Deprivation Center was repeatedly praised for its facilities. Rafael Correa described it at the time as "wonderful", not to mention that the detainees were in proper and dignified conditions. Suddenly, this place, presented as the ultimate example of improving social reintegration in the country, has become something that looks like hell. Correa even compared Glas's transfer to this prison with a "Nazi tactic" of deterrence.
Aside from the exaggeration and inconsistency of the correístas, the Lenin Moreno government was still wrong. For months, he treated differently a person convicted of a crime. His political activity and his relationships gave him access to benefits that, legally, did not correspond to him, reinforcing the idea that we lived in the land of privileges, that having a form of power granted a kind of patent to outlawing small and big things.
After the Moreno government was ridiculed for escaping Fernando Alvarado, faced with confusion and lack of answers, the transfer of Jorge Glas to Latacunga was interpreted as a desperate attempt to divert the attention of the public about negligence. of some institutions in the leak of an investigated for corruption. In a few days, we have seen how the application of the law was transformed into a prisoner of injustice, an act of revenge emptied of its symbolic meaning (the principle that each person is treated on one foot equality before the law); stating that the respect of the rules depends on the mind and the will of the decision-maker, deepening the feeling that we do not live in a state of law in which the desire of the leaders, and not the rules, governs the life in the society. Apparently, discretion and exceptional treatment remain the common practice that places every citizen in a state of permanent risk and uncertainty.
On more than one occasion, human rights organizations have denounced and continue to denounce the following conditions: persons deprived of their liberty in Latacunga, restrictions on visits for reasons of distance and treatment, lack of water, limitation of clothing, medical care and food. All these allegations were rejected and the complainants ridiculed.
Cynicism and the unacceptable double standards of those who compare Glas's transfer to Latacunga with Nazi tactics and the terrible negligence (if not corruption) of the controllers. from the electronic channel, they have written a new page of shame that casts doubt on the rights and the right of subsistence of life in society.
Source link
