[ad_1]
The Occidente Fiscala is currently working on obtaining contextual evidence to reconstruct the events that took place at the dawn of June 13 at the Arturo Merino Bentez Airport, where a rifleman fired twice against a policeman. The driver of Uber who hits him with his vehicle.
For this, the prosecutor in charge of the investigation, Eduardo Baeza, asked last Monday the videos of the security cameras of the premises and those obtained by witnesses in the place. He also asked the Central Comunicaciones de Carabineros (Cenco) for information records of reports and requests made by police officers who were on the site of the event. The persecutor hopes to determine the reason for police control and the previous actions that triggered the confrontation between the two involved in the case.
In another order of investigation, the IDP's criminal investigation laboratory took chemical samples and carried out expert appraisals. . This adds to the requirement of Carabineros to issue the institutional protocol on the use of weapons.
In this line, the statement is badyzed, also in context, delivered by the mate of Blas Villarroel, who was in the quarter watch at the airport
The facts before the shooting
The version PDI contributed by Corporal 2 Miguel Angel Fandez said that around 12:15 pm on June 13, he was with Villarroel, at the first level near the exit number 5 of the precinct, where they noticed that "I'm going to be there." a vehicle was behind a station wagon, "which was very close (…) since it is a very common act to escape the C & # 39; s why is the Corporal Villarroel decides to stop the vehicle, mark Chevrolet, blue in order to control it. "
Explains that Villarroel asked the driver to get off the vehicle, while encomender interviewing the people who were at the 39, inside the car; more specifically, the co-pilot, who indicated that 39; "he had rented the service through the Uber application", in front of which he asked the occupants to get off the car, "since this was going to be out of circulation for paid public transport It adds that the driver, who was with his partner behind the vehicle, is again placed on the driver's seat "by placing a lock on the doors".
Fandez explains that it is at this point that the 2 end is located in front of the car "so that I can not move forward, immediately direct me to the driver's door for the driver." ;open". After trying several times, he does not succeed. He adds that the driver "ignored the instructions."
The witness badures the IDP that in this context his colleague "removes his service weapon and the place pointing to the ground, while I took my rod for object" break the glbad. "In addition, he reports that the driver repeatedly hits the vehicle on my legs, at which point the driver tries to enter the second lane of traffic, my colleague takes a first shot to keep the threat; this continues to progress, at which point my colleague pulls a second time at the vehicle to restrain and control the vehicle, so that the driver advances, loses control and collides with a second vehicle. "
Emphasizes that they gave Villarroel first aid, "since he was complaining of a chest pain."
Grouping of the case
Next July 9th will be the hearing in which the prosecutor Baeza will communicate the consolidation of the two investigations Regarding the persons involved, whose statements, as defendants, were postponed pending the decision of the court.
The persecutor explained that in a single the investigation the driver of the Uber and the rifleman will have the victim status and Ambin imputed, since the two are accused of a homicide frustrated.
However, Baeza explained that "with regard to the action of the carabinero, the crime to investigate will be frustrated with homicide and possibly also injuries." The homicide frustrated has a penalty that begins within 5 years and a day, and the crime of injury has a lower penalty, but all this in the context of determining whether it was justified in the legitimate defense. "
In the case of Muoz, the prosecutor said: "what is seen is an attack on authority and also minor injuries to an official Carabineros, in which sentences are significantly inferior".
In any case, he said that the investigation should lead to know if there were any crimes ", but it is to investigate as a whole, because a action is absolutely tied to the other.If we delete the action performed by the driver of Uber, spur the carabinier, we could say: well, s & # 39; 39, he had not rammed it, the rifleman does not shoot and vice versa.This is why I believe that the most appropriate thing is to investigate as a whole, because an action explains the Other. "
Although the two accused were summoned to be declared accused, the prosecutor decided to postpone the proceedings, pending the group of cases
Related cases
The carabinero and the driver are both victims and imputed at the same time.
Source link
