[ad_1]
The third day of oral trial began with a slight delay in Osorno, by the mbadacre of hundreds of calves in the premises of the company Manuka.
On Monday, the Socialist deputy Fidel Espinoza had to indicate how he became aware of the case after he lodged a complaint.
The member of Parliament where he was was in Room 1 of the local court. subjected to a series of questions, stating that, first of all, the case had not started as a complaint of ill-treatment, but rather for the psychological damage that the workers sustained when they were forced to kill – with brutal methods – newborn calves.
https://media.biobiochile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/261118-espinoza-1-tlc.mp3
In conversation with the families of the workers There was a The turning point that marked the investigation, said Espinoza, which is linked to the death of specimens that were dying of hunger – it could take days – which was heard at night the moaning of animals .
https: //media.biobi ochile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/261118-espinoza-2-tlc.mp3[19659005vreD'otherfeatureswhichthefirststudyhavebeenaddedtothe###################################################################################################inoppositiontothebadpracticeshadtoundergotheharbadmentoftheformerdirectorofproduction even obliged to present medical licenses.Francisco Ehrenfeld, commented that a person had given direct order, to which there was no way to refuse without losing his job.
https://media.biobiochile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/261118-admin-1-tlc.mp3In what He refers to the only accused, said that although 39, he executed his orders, there was no opposition but, in his opinion, he was aware that he shared in a certain way a such a reduction in costs.
https: // media. biobiochile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/261118-admin-2-tlc.mp3[19659005HERPuisleprocesscontreGoncontinued'avancerzaloGarcíaresponsabled'ÁreaSecadelasocietyManukapourquileparquetdemandeenplusd'nepeineunepeinedcruisesd'imprisonmentmineurThis article describes an ongoing court process
It is possible that the charges will be dismissed at the end of the investigation. Therefore, the defendant should not be considered guilty The judiciary pronounces a judgment against him
(Article 04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure)
[ad_2]
Source link