[ad_1]
Artificial intelligence is moving at full speed, but its unrestricted application raises concerns about various problems in social life.
Even with remarkable successes and diverse uses, the growing capacity of computers to learn in data processing must also be considered for their mistakes.
This week, two news gave insights on the need to implement with care the solutions that artificial intelligence can offer today in health and safety management.
This was nothing less than the systems of two giants of technology, IBM and Amazon . But even the products of these powers are saved from devastating criticism and militate for their regulation.
The supercomputer and cancer
Watson is the engine of artificial IBM intelligence With the help of advanced technologies computer – based learning, this supercomputer of luck applies to a variety of businesses and research, in all fields and industries.
What makes Watson, before a question, badyze the data, automatically learn and propose solutions to work
For that, study the structure of what is questioned and use millions of logical rules to give the best answer . This is not for nothing that is called the companion of Sherlock Holmes.
Ginni Rometty, the CEO of IBM, one of the leaders in the field of applied artificial intelligence. (Bloomberg)
His application ranges from energy to finance, human resources to cooking. But this Wednesday revealed Watson's disability in the health field.
The medical experts who worked with IBM discovered a year ago the errors made by the supercomputer in the badysis of oncological diagnoses and the offer of treatments
] "This product is a shit"
A doctor from Florida to IBM
According to documents accessible only by the specialized health site Stat the experts had discovered "multiple examples of dangerous and bad treatment recommendations " in the system.
One case was that of a 65-year-old man who had lung cancer and hemorrhages. Watson has suggested that he is prescribed chemotherapy and Bevacizumab, the drug of a drug (in Argentina, it is marketed by Roche) whose leaflet warns that it increases the risk of bleeding.
It is not known if this example was that of a real patient or if it was part of a hypothetical evaluation. But the experts have widely criticized Watson's oncology system and claimed that he made recommendations "often inaccurate" according to the documents he consulted Stat .
In 2011, Watson became famous by winning the Jeopardy Q & A program. (AP)
The product, they said, generates "serious doubts about the process in which the underlying content and technology are developed."
A doctor from a Florida hospital was more categorical IBM: "This product is a shit."
Consulted by the site Gizmodo of IBM, they said that they "learned and improved Watson in the field of health based on continuous customer feedback, new scientific evidence and new cancer alternatives and their treatments . "
Watson's oncology system, said a spokesman for the company, is a It has been used to train doctors in the treatment of 13 types of cancer and is used in 230 hospitals across the world, and "supported the treatment of more than 84,000 patients."
The system that saw the thieving politicians
On Thursday, an American civil rights NGO revealed that Amazon's controversial system of facial recognition did not distinguish between a criminal and a politician.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) tested the Rekognition software, which Jeff Bezos' company sells to various government entities in the United States. The results were disturbing (though hilarious).
ACLU had Rekognition badyze the faces of the more than 500 members of the United States Congress and the system responded that 28 lawmakers had been arrested for criminal acts, which was false.
Rekognition is called the system that different police forces have tried to identify people in real time. (Amazonia)
Rekognition, which costs $ 12, compares the new faces it records with images from large photographic databases (for example, medical records). Thus, he promises to automatically identify people with a criminal past or present.
But in the test that the ACLU did, the software granted a criminal past to MPs and Senators, Democrats and Republicans, with no criminal record. To make matters worse, the organization pointed out that 39 percent of misunderstandings were with color lawmakers.
The Amazon system said that deputy Sanford Bishop had been arrested for a crime. It was wrong.
"Identification, whether precise or not, could cost a person his freedom or even his life." People of color are already disproportionately affected by police practices and it is easy to see that Rekognition's organization , which advocates a law that regulates facial recognition, also warned that technology could threaten the right to religious expressions and the protest.
When the specialized site Ars contacted Amazon, the society has recommended that in the identification of people (for example, by security forces) you must trust only when there is a percentage of accuracy greater than 95 percent.
"An 80% confidence is an acceptable limit for photos of panchos, chairs, animals or for other uses in social networks," commented Amazon, pointing out: "In real-life situations, Amazon Rekognition is used almost exclusively to help shrink the field and allow humans to do accelerated exams and consider options using their criteria. "
Source link
