[ad_1]
On March 8, a few days after the change of command, the government of Michelle Bachelet reduced the sanctions imposed by the Comptroller against Cristián Riquelme, [ancien Président]. The Moneda and acquitted three other defendants.
The four officials (one of whom would remain in office) had been the subject of an investigation awarding millionaire contracts to suppliers related to Riquelme between 2013 and 2015
It was Comercial A and R who pbaded to his wife, and Greentec who was in charge of his ex-partner.
A week after the publication of Ciper Chile, Riquelme resigned from his position to avoid another government crisis.
Finally, after investigating, the Office of the Controller decided to propose to the Bachelet administration a series of sanctions against the 4 people involved. For Riquelme, it had been proposed to suspend him from his position (which he did not occupy) for 30 days, with 50% of his salary, which amounted to $ 7,765,741 in amount. gross.
This penalty was lowered by the Ministry of the Interior of the Bachelet Administration to a "Censorship" which is the lowest disciplinary measure for administrative misconduct, according to The Tercera.
Germán Yovane Monetta, Head of the Legal Service, who would remain in office, will be fined 15% of his salary. For Natalie Vilches Jara, former director of supplies at La Moneda, and for Óscar Sandoval Navarrete, who took the post of Riquelme after his resignation, a penalty of 20% of his remuneration was proposed.
However, with the signing of Decrees 397 and 398 of the Ministry of the Interior of March 8, 2018 the three are acquitted decision which will then be taken by the controller for purposes of its decision. The agency responded on September 11, 2018 stating that the resolution "does not accord with the history of the summary procedure".
According to the means, the controller Jorge Bermúdez answered that the reduction of the sanctions "does not correspond to the proven infractions during the disciplinary procedure."
He defended that the investigation had led "to all proceedings to establish the truth and the existence of the offenses "and that the proposed sanctions were based on" omissions based on the grounds of direct hiring, (which) could not be skewed during the course of ". investigation. "
In this regard, he argued that " there is no objective background which proves that the suppliers hired were the only ones to comply " in each case, with the requirements of discretion and confidence that will guarantee the security of the Presidency of the Public Republic It is also important to underline the public nature of the resources involved in each of the administrative acts in question, on which the Administrative issues indicated in each of the charges are configured. "
After that, a copy of The decision was pbaded on to the administration of Sebastián Piñera in order to" reevaluate the documents contained in the case file and order it. the application of penalties proportionate to the offenses committed by the accused "[[19659002] Although some of the sanctioned persons have already terminated their duties, they would be demerit marks in their curriculum vitae, who would have affect their future if they wish to return to work for the state.
[ad_2]
Source link
