The bureaucracy presents a motion of censure against the table of the House



[ad_1]

The President of the Corporation, Maya Fernandez (PS), said that she would "do it again", because it would not have been good if the table "had kept silent about the saying that parliamentarians do not work ". "

Maya Fernández (file photo, Agencia Uno).

As previously announced, the deputies of Chile Vamos have today tabled a motion of censure against the table of the lower house, led by Socialist Maya Fernández, following the letter sent to President Sebastián Piñera after accusing opposition obstruction and sent parliamentarians to work. This, despite the search for agreements that had taken place between the opposition and the government, through a meeting between Interior Minister, Andrés Chadwick, and the Senators of the old New Majority

. RN Leopoldo Perez, the presentation has to do with a thing "clearly regulatory, here we do not make a political bad", but this arises because "what is questioned is as soon as they hold a position and signed a document on behalf of the Society, the 155 deputies. "Therefore, he concludes that" not only the opinion of the House was respected, but also the right of minorities, in the case of Chile, we are 47% of the Chamber of Deputies ".

In any case, yesterday, the spokeswoman, Cecilia Perez, had already made it clear that since La Moneda, the measure had full support, since the hpy MP's argument coincides perfectly with the minister's remarks Monday, which stressed that "the Chamber of Deputies, headed by its president, does not hear the votes of all the commissions, does not represent all the parliamentary deputies convened, but sends a letter of a tone that does not correspond, in form or substance to the President of the Republic. "For the same reason, the Socialist MP, Fidel Espinoza, accused the government of typing this presentation.

For his part, the Speaker of the House, Maya Fernández, did not disagree with what the right to "censor" did. the table to defend the work of parliamentarians "and added that" I would do it again ", because it would not have been good if the table" had remained silent before the sayings that parliamentarians and parliamentarians do not work not. It would come to my mind to say that the government is not working. "Article 46 number 1, explained, of the Congress Rules empowers the table in this situation.

And before the appointment takes place between a group of Senators of the old new majority and the Minister of the Interior at home, the MP reiterates his position that she prefers "institutional dialogues."

[ad_2]
Source link