[ad_1]
In 1931, Winston Churchill predicts that someday, the human race "would escape the nonsense of raising an entire chicken to eat the bad or wing, producing these pieces separately under appropriate means ".
87 years later. This day has arrived. That's what we discovered in Just, a food business in which we tried chicken nuggets created from the cells of a chicken feather.
We learned that chicken (which tastes like chicken) was still I live on a farm near the laboratory.
This meat should not be confused with vegetarian veggie burgers and other meat substitutes that are gaining popularity in supermarkets.
No, it's real meat produced. Animal cells and described in different ways: cultured, synthetic, in vitro, cultured in the laboratory or even "clean".
Churchill said that it was absurd to create a whole chicken to eat only the chest or the wing, so that the l? humanity would eventually produce these pieces separately. (GETTY IMAGES)
It takes about two days to produce a chicken nugget in a small bioreactor, using a protein to stimulate cell multiplication, a kind of support for structuring the product [19659003TheresultaccordingtoJust'sCEOJoshTetrickwillbeonthemenuofseveralrestaurantslaterthisyear
"We do things like: eggs, ice cream or butter with plants, and we make meat with meat, you just do not need to kill the l '. animal, "he says.
And what taste do these nuggets have?
We tried them and, the truth, it was awesome. The skin was crisp and the meat tasty, although its internal texture is a little sweeter than what one would expect from a nugget eg from McDonald's or KFC .
Tetrick and other entrepreneurs working in this sector the "cellular flesh" says want to stop the slaughter of animals and protect the environment from the degradation of intensive industrial agriculture .
They say that they solve the problem of feeding a growing population without destroying the planet and point out that its flesh is not genetically modified or that it is unhealthy. she needs antibiotics to grow.
So are the "nuggets" of Just, out of the laboratory.
The United Nations claim that breeding animals for food is one of the main causes of global warming and pollution of the world. air and water.
Although the Vencional breeding industry strives to be more efficient and respectful of the environment, many doubt that it can accompany the growing hunger of the world to consume protein.
"We kill 70,000 million animals each year to feed 7 billion people" Memphis Meats, Uma Valeti, a cardiologist and founder of one of California's leading cell-based meat companies, California.
Valeti says global demand for meat is doubling as more people emerge from poverty. Mankind will not be able to raise enough cattle and chickens to satisfy the appetite of 9,000 million people in 2050.
"So we could literally grow meat, poultry or fruits directly from these animal cells, "he says.
Lack of regulation
Many Americans say that they eat less meat, but the numbers come from the United States Department of Agriculture. . (USDA, for its acronym) suggest that the average consumer will still consume more than 100 kg of red meat and poultry this year, about nine kilos more than what he ate in the 1970s. [19659003] 
Demand for meat products is increasing worldwide.
The pioneer of cellular agriculture is the Dutch scientist Mark Post. Its first laboratory-grown hamburger, grilled in 2013, cost $ 300,000.
No company has yet expanded its production to commercially serve a burger made from cells, but Post estimates that if it starts to produce its burgers en mbade, could reduce the cost of production to about $ 10 a piece .
"This is of course too high," he admits.
If Just manages to produce enough chicken nuggets for sale this year, it's unlikely to be in an American restaurant because the country's government is still deciding what to do.
Most food products in the United States. they are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
But some, especially conventionally raised meats, are regulated by the USDA. So, if we buy a frozen pizza in the United States, the USDA is responsible for the pepperoni and FDA cheese.
The main ingredient of pizza will determine the body that will regulate its review and marketing in the United States. (GETTY IMAGES)
"We are talking about several countries in Asia and Europe," says Tetrick. According to him, "US regulations are unclear," while the USDA and the FDA hold public hearings on the subject.
"I believe that there are countries that want to take the lead in this area.With regard to foodstuffs, because of sustainability issues or simply to build an entirely new economy, they want to take the lead. Initiative, "said Tetrick.
The ultimate goal is to move cell meat laboratories to large manufacturing plants.
Now, dozens of companies are working in the region and they are attracting venture capital investments via Silicon Valley. Billionaires like Bill Gates and Richard Branson have invested in technology.
What do breeders think?
The Cattlemen's Association has a lobby or a major lobby and, without a doubt, a more revered or romantic symbol in the country's history as the clbadic cowboy or cowboy .
But Midwestern farmers are entering the debate over the sale of this new product: like pure meat, cell meat, meat without sacrificing animals, ethical proteins or simply the meat?
In his Ozarks ranch, a mountainous region that stretches from Missouri to Arkansas, Kalena and Billy Bruce feed their herd of black angus cattle with the help of his four-year-old daughter , Willa.
Kalena and Billy Bruce believe that this meat must indicate on its label that it comes from a laboratory. ]
"I think it should be labeled correctly: a protein produced in the laboratory," says Billy. "When I think of meat, I think of what is behind us, in an animal that breathes alive," he adds.
The state of Missouri is of the same opinion. At the request of farmers, it was decreed that meat tags could only be used on livestock products.
"From the point of view of transparency for consumers, so that they know what they buy and what they feed on. According to Kalena, families must be called differently," he said. said Kalena.
Lia Biondo, director of policies and outreach of the American Cattlemen's Association, hopes that the law of Missouri can be replicated in other states.
" We will let these companies decide how to call their products as long as they do not call it meat or beef, "he said.
Does he accept?
Would he really eat it? The customers of Lamberts, a traditional restaurant of Ozark, still seem to have to be convinced.
"Meat must be bred in a farm, on the ground", says Jerry Kimrey, construction worker.
"I like to know where it comes from, what i is natural and is not treated in the laboratory, "says Professor Ashley Pospisil.
Many people are reluctant to consume this type of food. meat. (1945)
"There is something that scares me in creation by man, we just cause destruction, I like the idea of the God's creation, "says Linda Hilburn while eating a steak.
Although she is not the only one to have this idea of "Frankenstein food", as some critics called it; Josh Tetrick insists that cell-based meat is totally free of many animal diseases that undermine the production of traditional meat.
And bet on the human experience in favor of progress.
"In the end, when he went from the ice picker to the refrigerator, or to kill whales, to refine oil in kerosene and pbad after kerosene in the bulb … although people badociated with it. First, the bulb to the devil … humanity has managed to accept something new. "
" It always happens that way, and if I had to bet, it would also happen with that. "
[ad_2]
Source link
