[ad_1]
The Chinese authorities, as well as Nutrien and the National Economic Prosecutor, presented on the eve of the trial a history stating whether the appeal was admissible.
A final set of findings was submitted to the Constitutional Court before we know today whether the appeal was admissible. Pampa Calichera to terminate the agreement reached between the National Economic Prosecutor's Office and Tianqi by SQM is eligible or not.
Tianqi was the most active in presenting the most recent information. For example, in a 27-page document, it was stated that companies related to Julio Ponce had a weak and unfounded unconstitutional complaint.
One of the points that is being further emphasized is the reason why provisional measures are sought before the Constitutional Court. and not before the Tribunal for the defense of free competition, which – in the opinion of China – is the place to do so.
"It is not understood that the use of a far-fetched and implausible constitutional argument allows to obtain something similar," he said by l & # 3939; intermediary of his lawyer, Arturo Fermandois.
In addition, faced with the argument that he had not benefited from due process, he indicated a list of news published since March 2018 that explained the course of the proceedings. investigation before the National Economic Prosecutor. regarding the possible arrival of Tianqi to SQM.
Nutrien opposes reports submitted by Grupo Pampa alleging that they contain errors in the law of documents. Professors Alejandro Romero and Marisol Peña
also made direct reference to the fact that companies related to Ponce attempted to demonstrate that the previous Tianqi-Tianqi negotiation had not been relevant, which the Canadian attempted to denature in court.
On the same subject, Tianqi also made some of his arguments. In an additional letter from lawyers Juan Carlos Riesco and Constanza Hube, he explained that in September 2015, the CEO of Chinese society, Vivian Wu had met Eugenio Ponce ] to demonstrate the formal interest in acquiring the full participation of Oro Blanco in Pampa Calichera and thus achieve the SQM.
From there began a long process led by the bank Itaú where he even considered a formal offer. and a draft proposal for a Joint Action Pact, "without our receiving any comments from Grupo Papa, badociated with restrictions of free competition or sensitive information flows, such as he now intends to introduce in the public debate, "said the president. written.
In March 2016, Tianqi's Chinese leaders met directly with Julio Ponce and Patricio Contesse Fica, who then met in New York at the end of September of the same year. where was even Weiping Jiang, founder and controller of the company.
"The last minute requests made by the seller have ended the long process of negotiation that has just been transcribed," said the Chinese (See full document here).
The National Economic Prosecutor's Office made it clear to the court that one of the reports of the Pampa group, commissioned by Professor Alejandro Romero, contradicts the premise presented as to why the appeal should be admissible and supports the position of the persecutor.
Source link
