Chromothripsy causes the progression of gene amplification in cancer



[ad_1]

  • 1.

    Benner, SE, Wahl, GM & Von Hoff, DD Double minute chromosomes and regions of homogeneous staining in tumors taken directly from patients versus human tumor cell lines. Anticancer drugs 2, 11–25 (1991).

    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Turner, KM et al. Amplification of extrachromosomal oncogenes leads to tumor progression and genetic heterogeneity. Nature 543, 122–125 (2017).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Article

  • 3.

    Albertson, DG Gene Amplification in Cancer. Genet trends. 22, 447–455 (2006).

    MathSciNet CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Alt, FW, Kellems, RE, Bertino, JR & Schimke, RT Selective multiplication of dihydrofolate reductase genes in methotrexate resistant variants of cultured murine cells. J. Biol. Chem. 253, 1357–1370 (1978).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Kaufman, RJ, Brown, PC & Schimke, RT Dihydrofolate reductase genes amplified in unstably methotrexate resistant cells are associated with double minute chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States 76, 5669-5673 (1979).

    ADS CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Nunberg, JH, Kaufman, RJ, Schimke, RT, Urlaub, G. & Chasin, LA The genes for amplified dihydrofolate reductase are located in a region of homogeneous staining of a single chromosome in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line resistant to methotrexate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States 75, 5553–5556 (1978).

    ADS CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • seven.

    Carroll, SM et al. Double minute chromosomes can be produced from precursors derived from a chromosomal deletion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 1525-1533 (1988).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Ruiz, JC & Wahl, GM Chromosomal destabilization during gene amplification. Mol. Cell. Biol. ten, 3056-3066 (1990).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Coquelle, A., Rozier, L., Dutrillaux, B. & Debatisse, M. Induction of multiple double-stranded breaks in an hsr by expression of I-SceI meganuclease or activation of the fragile site leads to the formation double minutes and other chromosomal rearrangements. Oncogene 21, 7671–7679 (2002).

    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • ten.

    Nathanson, DA et al. Targeted treatment resistance mediated by dynamic regulation of extrachromosomal mutant EGFR DNA. Science 343, 72–76 (2014).

    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar article

  • 11.

    The ICGC / TCGA Whole Genome Pan-Cancer Analysis Consortium. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).

  • 12.

    Li, Y. et al. Models of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature 578, 112–121 (2020).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Article

  • 13.

    Cortes-Ciriano, I. et al. Complete chromothripsy analysis in 2,658 human cancers by whole genome sequencing. Night. Broom. 52, 331–341 (2020).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Stephens, PJ et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144, 27–40 (2011).

    MathSciNet CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Article

  • 15.

    deCarvalho, AC et al. The discordant inheritance of chromosomal and extrachromosomal DNA elements contributes to the dynamic course of the disease in glioblastoma. Night. Broom. 50, 708–717 (2018).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Verhaak, RGW, Bafna, V. & Mischel, PS Amplification of extrachromosomal oncogenes in the pathogenesis and evolution of tumors. Night. Tower. Cancer 19, 283-288 (2019).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Rausch, T. et al. Pediatric medulloblastoma genome sequencing links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations. Cell 148, 59–71 (2012).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Nones, K. et al. Genomic disasters frequently occur in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and result in tumorigenesis. Nat. Common. 5, 5224 (2014).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Article

  • 19.

    Ly, P. et al. Chromosomal segregation errors generate a diverse spectrum of simple and complex genomic rearrangements. Night. Broom. 51, 705–715 (2019).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Singer, MJ, Mesner, LD, Friedman, CL, Trask, BJ & Hamlin, JL Amplification of the human dihydrofolate reductase gene via double minutes is initiated by chromosome breaks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States 97, 7921–7926 (2000).

    ADS CAS Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Windle, B., Draper, BW, Yin, YX, O’Gorman, S. & Wahl, GM A central role for chromosome disruption in gene amplification, deletion formation and amplicon integration. Genes Dev. 5, 160-174 (1991).

    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 22.

    McClintock, B. The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea mays. Genetic 26, 234-282 (1941).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Glodzik, D. et al. A somatic mutation process recursively reproduces germline sensitivity loci and tissue-specific superamplifiers in breast cancer. Night. Broom. 49, 341–348 (2017).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Garsed, DW et al. The architecture and evolution of cancerous neochromosomes. Cancer cell 26, 653–667 (2014).

    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 25.

    Landry, JJ et al. The genomic and transcriptomic landscape of a HeLa cell line. G3 (Bethesda) 3, 1213-1224 (2013).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 26.

    Zhang, CZ et al. Chromothripsy due to DNA damage in the micronuclei. Nature 522, 179–184 (2015).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Article

  • 27.

    Yaeger, R. et al. The mechanisms of acquired resistance to BRAF V600E inhibition in colon cancers converge on RAF dimerization and are sensitive to its inhibition. Cancer Res. 77, 6513–6523 (2017).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Ly, P. et al. Selective inactivation of the Y centromere triggers breakage of chromosomes in micronuclei and repair by a non-homologous end junction. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 68–75 (2017).

    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Shimizu, N., Hashizume, T., Shingaki, K. & Kawamoto, JK Amplification of plasmids containing a mammalian replication initiation region is mediated by a controllable conflict between replication and transcription. Cancer Res. 63, 5281-5290 (2003).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Maciejowski, J., Li, Y., Bosco, N., Campbell, PJ & de Lange, T. Chromothripsis and kataegis induced by telomere crisis. Cell 163, 1641-1654 (2015).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Hoffelder, DR et al. Resolution of anaphase bridges in cancer cells. Chromosome 112, 389–397 (2004).

    PubMed Google Scholar article

  • 32.

    Helleday, T., Petermann, E., Lundin, C., Hodgson, B. & Sharma, RA DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer treatment. Night. Tower. Cancer 8, 193–204 (2008).

    Google Scholar CAS PubMed article

  • 33.

    Cermak, T. et al. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Res nucleic acids. 39, e82 (2011).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 34.

    Fachinetti, D. et al. The specific binding to the CENP-B DNA sequence enhances the fidelity of human centromere function. Dev. Cell 33, 314–327 (2015).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Schindelin, J. et al. Fidji: an open-source platform for the analysis of biological images. Nat. Methods 9, 676-682 (2012).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Or, HD et al. ChromEMT: visualization of the structure of chromatin in 3D and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells. Science 357, eaag0025 (2017).

    PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Or, HD, Deerinck, TJ, Bushong, E., Ellisman, MH & O’Shea, CC Visualization of viral protein structures in cells using genetic probes for correlated light and electron microscopy. Methods 90, 39–48 (2015).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Rao, SS et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals the principles of the chromatin loop. Cell 159, 1665-1680 (2014).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • 39.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long read alignment with the Burrows-Wheeler transformation. Bioinformatics 26, 589-595 (2010).

    PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar

  • 40.

    Raine, KM et al. ascatNgs: identification of somatically acquired copy number alterations from whole genome sequencing data. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 56, 15.9.1-15.9.17 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 41.

    Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 genome-wide breast cancer sequences. Nature 534, 47–54 (2016).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Article

  • 42.

    Korbel, JO & Campbell, PJ Criteria for the inference of chromothripsy in cancer genomes. Cell 152, 1226-1236 (2013).

    Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 43.

    Li, Y. et al. Constitutional and somatic rearrangement of chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nature 508, 98–102 (2014).

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Article

  • 44.

    Alexandrov, LB, Nik-Zainal, S., Wedge, DC, Campbell, PJ & Stratton, MR Deciphering the signatures of mutational processes operating in human cancer. Cell representative. 3, 246–259 (2013).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

  • [ad_2]

    Source link