Coke-funded nutritional research – and anti-sugar results killed



[ad_1]

Canceled

Coca-Cola invests heavily in nutrition and health research. But recently discovered documents reveal that money comes with conditions.

If Coca-Cola did not like the results of a study, such as if researchers thought sweet drinks were not good for people, the small print allowed Coca-Cola to snap its fingers and prevent the search from seeing the light of day. day, according to an article published Wednesday in the newspaper Journal of Public Health Policy.

dusted

The team that unveiled these Coca-Cola contracts, from the US and Europe, reviewed the beverage company's contracts with Louisiana State University, the University of South Carolina, the University of Washington and the University of Toronto.

The agreements not only gave the multinational soda giant the right to review all the nutrition research they had funded in those universities before publication, but also to check whether the research included a disclosure that it was funded. by Coca-Cola.

"This shows what we have all suspected for a long time," said Marion NestlĂ©, a nutrition scientist at New York University. reverse. "Companies that sponsor research ensure that they have the right price for them … Industry-funded research is marketing research, not scientific research."

Always

Coca-Cola rebuffed against the findings, saying that he stopped funding health research.

"We agree that the transparency and integrity of research is important," said a Coca-Cola spokesperson. reverse. "This is why, since 2016, The Coca-Cola Company has not independently funded research on health and wellness issues, in accordance with the research guiding principles published on our website since . "

READ MORE: University archives reveal Coca-Cola's immense power over health research[[[[reverse]

More about nutrition: Wrong studies mean that everything you know about nutrition is wrong

[ad_2]

Source link