[ad_1]
After exhaustively badyzing the tissues that make up the Shroud of Turin, a group of scientists determined that the present spots did not result from contact with a human body.
badyzing the alleged blood pattern present on the Shroud, they discovered that blood-like stains are incompatible with each other, since some seem to have been produced from a body while standing, whereas Others are false.
which has the markings of a man, was long regarded as the piece of cloth with which they wrapped Jesus of Nazareth after being crucified; According to legend, the image was transferred during the three days his body was buried.
Over time, scientists have not been able to answer how the image was created in the tissue, but some red spots that are consistent with the wounds after the crucifixion contain Iron oxide, which can come from pigments, or from blood.
In addition, according to radiocarbon techniques, the shroud dates back to the time when Jesus was alive. Nazareth however, conclusive evidence regarding blood stains had not been obtained, which has increased the scientific interest in the use of forensic techniques to study the piece of tissue.
The authenticity of the Shroud of Turin is tested
The research in question was conducted by anthropologist Matteo Borrini, of the University of Liverpool John Moores, UK, and organic chemist Luigi Garlaschelli, of the Committee Italian for the Search for Pseudoscience Claims
Instead of testing the substance, the researchers used a person and a manikin to observe the blood flow into the wounds with which the body of Jesus is characterized.
This is what is called Blood Stain Pattern Analysis, for which they used two types: the human blood of a gift for research and synthetic blood with the same physical properties. chemical.
Next, the blood flow in the blood was badyzed. Shroud from different angles: on the back of the hand in contact with the wood, to observe the pattern corresponding to the hand; in the left forearm, with blood dripping from the hand, standing, lying on his back, among others.
Similarly, small hemorrhages were studied on the back of the left hand and blood resulting from the After doing this, although the wood test did not yield conclusive results, the tests blood flow show that the cloth cover has turned out to be a disaster; for example, drip into the hand and the flow into the forearm produced spots with completely different angles.
Thus, the drip seen in the Shroud was reproduced when, in the tests, the arms were placed at a 45 degree angle, but was not observed during the test of the alleged actual position of the body.
Similarly, the wound of the spear was consistent on the Shroud if the subject had been standing, only that the water courses were formed of a solid stain, as seen on the cloth. In addition, the place on the lower back could not be reproduced. In this regard, the researchers commented:
"Assuming that the red spots of the Turin Shroud are really the product of the blood wounds after the crucifixion, the experiments show that patterns of flow of different parts of the body are not consistent (…) Assuming different types of bleeding in different positions, no coherence has been found, so they seem unrealistic. "
Therefore, it is concluded that the inconsistencies identified seem to indicate that the image is not genuine, representing evidence against the Shroud of Turin, which, according to the researchers, may be an artistic or didactic representation of the fourteenth century. However, there is a lot of fabric to cut, we can discover how the image was formed and what is its purpose.
Reference: A BPA approach to the Shroud of Turin, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13867
Source link
