[ad_1]
Was it regular or bad? The answer about Stanley Kubrick's academic performance (New York, USA, July 26, 1928 – St. Albans, UK, March 7, 1999) is still a topic of debate.
Of course, the tests of intelligence they reflected a level above the average. Then? Kubrick was bored in clbad. His teachers looked at him with some disgust sitting there, but with his head elsewhere; "He's on the moon," grandmothers would say.
His father, Jacob Leonard, was agitated, taught him to play chess to "awaken his intelligence". However, when he was 13, he gave her a gift with which he literally clicked to transform his existence and, incidentally, to stimulate him so that he would become one of the most creative ones. important of the seventh art: a camera, a Graflex of more than three kilos. "I fell in love with her, I fell in love," she will say later.
On Thursday of last week, it was 90 years since birth. A good excuse to wonder how his films would go to the box office today?
For the writer and film critic Ricardo Silva, the current audience would go to the author of 2001: Space Odyssey, The Mechanical Orange, Barry Lyndon, The Shining and the Face of the War, among others.
According to Silva, critics and the public sometimes tend to be in tune and walk hand in hand. "I think his films were and would be a hit today because he never belonged entirely to his time."
He was a cinematographic genius who drew a path that shows in the completion of many of the works of Steven Spielberg, Woody Allen, Martin Scorsese, James Cameron and Ridley Scott, including veteran Orson Welles, who came to consider him a "giant" among the young filmmakers of his time.
The statistics corroborate Silva's claim. Looking at box-office receipts for some of his films in the early years, compared to numbers adjusted to what is now worth the US votes, Kubrick would do very well.
So, for example, 2001: Odyssey's space in his first year, 1968, raised 58 and half a million dollars. That would be equivalent to $ 403 million today. The fire, which hit theaters in 1980, had $ 44 million. Today, it would be $ 152 million. Faced with the war, 1987, left in the coffers 46 million dollars which would be currently 109 million dollars.
Eyes Closed, 1999 – with the most famous couple in the Hollywood firmament of the time, Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, got $ 55 million, which to date would be $ 101 million.
Less optimistic A few days ago he showed the Spanish filmmaker Álex de la Iglesia, who badured that would not only be very difficult to find someone to finance these "crazy and brilliant ideas" of Kubrick but also that the public would accept his cinema. 19659002] "Today, people are very softened," said the director in the master clbad that SundanceTV, channel of the group AMC Networks, organizes every year at the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao. The creator of the Day of the Beast and the Community said that things have changed a lot. In the statements collected by the agency Europa Press reflected on their work in the present times:
" Management is not only a good idea, it is to find the Money to make the film .The relationship between budget and creativity, finding that balance, is the real profession of the director, "said De la Iglesia. And this legendary, almost legendary figure of the director as "this crazy, creative, authoritarian, magical character … this kind of Kubrick" is an exception that has occurred in the past and will not come back, condemned the # 39, Spanish
Of course, the reality today is completely different from that of the time when anxiety took over before an imminent Kubrick premiere.
For Bernardo Chinchilla, producer Chinchilla Films, "in the Trends of the International Market, the cinema is no longer only in competition with more cinema, it is more and more confronted with new platforms such as Netflix, video games, web series and, ultimately, free time so appreciated by the millennia. "
Chinchilla adds that" world trends are more focused on a shorter type of content. In the international market, the long ones are discarded. It is strange that in Colombia there are more and more tickets for movies because the general trend is downward. It is expected that in 20 years, cinema will be for more specialized spaces, for specific niches of customers who will want to see what they know they'll see. "
film critic Mauricio Reina considers that" two of the Kubrick films work perfectly for the public these days: "2001: Space Odyssey" and The Shining. "According to him," in both cases, the way of telling and the bill stands up perfectly to the test of time. "
Although Reina points out that El blaze works as a horror film so many years after its production, many Most notable is that it makes 2001: Space Odyssey as a sci-fi movie, "a sub-genre in which the development of special effects betrays the pbadage of time in ancient works. That's why 2001 is a clbadic and a masterpiece. "
The mechanical orange is, adds Reina, another that" is close to timelessness, but in production it shows a little more age. "
The monumental figure of Kubrick, for Juan David Blanco, a blogger at La Claqueta- is that "few filmmakers have understood the cinema like Stanley Kubrick, few took the risk of telling stories like he did. claustrophobic symmetry and premeditated frames of mechanical orange to the apseful and stunned camera of a few moments of The Shining. "
A fantastic spirit that sometimes seemed to return to those school years where he left his mind steal. "Kubrick manipulated a precious symbolism, so perfect that we do not know for sure whether it was measured or chance," says Blanco and concludes: "Intense stories with a touch of levity; the magician of feelings (explored and unexplored) He treated every plane with a whole and almost paternal devotion, integrated the music with force and with a precision without failure.He played in the cinema like no other . "
ARMANDO NEIRA
Director of the publication
EL TIEMPO
@armandoneira
[ad_2]
Source link
