[ad_1]
From disney Frozen ended up helping some researchers solve a cold 62-year-old case. Some new findings in Communications Earth and Environment show how these people used Pixar film technology to solve the Dyatlov Pass incident. For those who don’t know, a team of students and their instructor went on a mountaineering expedition to the Ural Mountains in 1959. What followed was pretty gruesome. Their tent was found after a snowstorm ripped apart from the inside and bodies strewn all around nearby areas with traumatic injuries. People wondered how this could have happened without a witness, and soon conspiracy theories began to erupt all around. However, that all changed when a current researcher looked Frozen for the first time.
A few years ago, Gaume was struck by how well the movement of snow was represented in the 2013 Disney movie Frozen – so impressed, in fact, that he decided to ask his animators how they got it. They succeeded. He ended up going to Hollywood to chat with them. 14 / x pic.twitter.com/Nj34ejn7vo
– Dr Robin George Andrews 🌋 (@SquigglyVolcano) January 28, 2021
In 2013, at the height of ice fever, Johan Guame of the Snow Avalanche Simulation Lab marveled at how Disney was able to create such realistic snow. The technology to simulate this movement was unprecedented. So, Guame sent the hosts to the survey. From there, he traveled to Los Angeles to meet with the specialist responsible for on-screen movement. The researcher obtained a version of the snow animation code for his avalanche simulations. Gaume intended to understand how avalanches would affect the human body.
In this disaster, the bodies of the travelers were found with extreme injuries, including blunt puncture wounds and cracked skulls. It turns out that when a wall of snow reaches a precise angle, that ice can be like a projectile. With the data in hand, you could build a model to explain these horrific injuries with a very normal avalanche. The displacement of bodies could be the result of some students trying to drag their friends to safety instead of just abandoning the camp. It’s a wild ride to think that a simple computer simulation could shed so much light on a 60-year-old case, but here it is.
“People don’t want it to be an avalanche,” Gaume says. “It’s too normal.”
Have you heard this story before? Do you think the explanation makes sense? Let us know in the comments
[ad_2]
Source link