Donald Trump's Secret Sauce 2020



[ad_1]

His overall work approval rating ranged from 40 to 30 years, or more than 30 years, during the first two years of his tenure. Polls in the critical critical states of the Midwest and Sun Belt suggest that its electoral map is shrinking rather than expanding compared to 2016.
And again and again and again, there is this: 71% of those surveyed in a new national CNN-SSRS survey think that the economy is either "pretty good" (45%) or "very good (26%) .This is the best rating for the economy in a CNN poll since February 2001. Which is a looooongue era.
It's not just that people believe that the economy is strong, either. It is that they give credit to Trump for this. A majority (51%) of CNN-SSRS polls approve of Trump's work with the economy, while 42% disapprove. (That's the only problem – out of the five surveyed – where more people approve that disapproves of what Trump does, Trump's overall approval rate in the survey is 42%.)

This economic message could well be Trump's secret recipe for 2020. In strong – or perceived – economies, voters tend to reward the incumbent president, just as they punish the president when the economic situation is failing. Trump could very well use this basic argument: You may not like me or my style of politics. But look at the results! Is it really time to change the president?

In fact, he seems to set the stage for such an argument.

"How can you remove a man who is considered by many to be the most successful president in the first two years of his history, especially when he has done nothing wrong and the dismissal is aimed at "great crimes and offenses"? " he tweeted last week.
Now. The health of the economy could change over the next year. The jobs report last month was not as rosy as the previous months. But for now, the perceived strength of the economy is Trump's best argument for 2020. By many

Point: The only chance of a second term in Trump lies in the fact that people believe that he is responsible for the economic rise. Even with that, he could lose. But without that, he will lose.

[ad_2]

Source link