Dr Fauci knew the truth about COVID-19 testing in July



[ad_1]

One of the most frustrating aspects of COVID-19 coverage has been the focus on ‘cases’, reinforced by the Mendacious Midget ™, Dr Anthony Fauci. In fact, he was wringing his hands over the increase in the number of “cases” on CNN in early October. These numbers are in fact positive tests. The New York Times and several experts admitted in late August that up to 90% of positive PCR tests were not indicative of active disease that could be transmitted to others.

In fact, Dr Anthony Fauci expressed a similar opinion in July. As I have pointed out several times before, the cycle threshold (Ct), or the number of times the test sample is amplified, is too high. According to Just the News, Dr. Fauci acknowledged this in an interview with “This Week in Virology”:

Joining the hosts of This Week in Virology in July, Fauci directly answered a question about the COVID-19 test, specifically how patients with positive tests could determine if they are truly infectious and need to be put in. quarantine.

“What’s starting to become a bit of a norm,” Fauci said, is that “if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more… the chances of it being replication safe are tiny. “

“It’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the doctors,” he continued, when “someone comes in and repeats their PCR, and it’s like [a] Threshold of 37 cycles, but you can almost never grow the virus from a cycle of 37 thresholds. “

So I think if somebody comes up with 37, 38, or even 36, you have to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.

He also noted that the Ct count was not automatically provided to patients and doctors. The tests are simply returned as positive or negative. The whole idea of ​​”asymptomatic” cases dissolves once you understand this. Especially when you understand that there is a level of immunity in the population due to the reactivity of T lymphocytes. This is long term immunity linked to exposure to other coronaviruses. People who have this reaction would have the same presentation as a cured patient.

Obviously, the CDC knew there was a problem with the capture of inert viral RNA. In July, the agency discouraged re-examining cured patients with mild to moderate illness. Here is the rationale:

Recovered individuals may continue to shed detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in upper respiratory tract samples for up to 3 months after onset of illness, although at considerably lower concentrations than during illness. , in ranges where the virus capable of replicating itself has not been reliably recovered and infectivity is unlikely.

It appears that the FDA was also aware of this problem in the PCR test. In the Emergency Use Authorization for the Panther Fusion COVID-19 PCR test, it is stated under “Limitations”:

E. A positive result indicates the detection of the nucleic acid of the virus concerned. Nucleic acid can persist even after the virus is no longer viable.

As well:

J. The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2 assay can be used to test asymptomatic individuals, although performance has not been demonstrated in an asymptomatic population. This test has been shown to have high sensitivity when tested with the FDA reference panel.

Certainly, Panther is one of the many PCR tests. however, The New York TimesThe CDC guidelines and Dr. Fauci’s comments confirm that these principles can be applied to PCR testing in general. Experts interviewed by The New York Times suggested that a threshold of 30 Ct would be appropriate. If Dr. Fauci came to this conclusion in July, why are labs in the United States still using up to 40 Ct. As the standard when it appears the correct Ct is somewhere between 30 and 35?

Dr Fauci and other “experts” like the former director of the FDA, Dr Scott Gottlieb, are constantly pushing positive tests and lamenting an increase in their numbers. They mistakenly refer to these numbers as cases, which they do not fall under any previous definition. It is also clear that there is probably a significant number of false positives. So what gives?

COVID-19 has obviously been used as a rhetorical weapon for club president Trump. It became clear by the end of the election that Dr Fauci was more political than he described when he essentially endorsed Joe Biden.

Also, part of the public health facility wants widespread immunization and other policies like mask warrants and phased lockdowns. High numbers of “cases” allow them to push these policies. High numbers of positive tests also create a higher R-null, which is the measure of contagiousness. These policies are easier to enforce if the public thinks COVID-19 is horribly contagious, making it a danger to loved ones at risk.

Perhaps most deceptively, the Ct is a simple pull lever to keep you in line and make Joe Biden a hero. Its new COVID panel will develop and implement a plan. Then the positive cases will drop like magic. Not because these policies were effective, but simply because they will compose the Ct with clear guidelines.

However, it will cement the supremacy of “experts” in the minds of many Americans who have not seen the dishonest little man behind the curtain. Don’t be one of those people.

Sorry Joe Biden, COVID -19 Restrictions End In Red States, So Stop The Drama
‘Fire Fauci’ is a Trump rallying cry we should all take behind
Dr Fauci: ‘There is no inconsistency’ in banning Church and business but allowing mass protests

[ad_2]

Source link