PSC and SUMA still do not define how they will vote in the case of Ana Galarza – La República EC



[ad_1]

QUITO-ECUADOR (01/10/2019). MP Ana Galarza, accompanied by her lawyer, Marcelo Dueñas, went to the Attorney General's Office to report a criminal record and challenge the complaint of her former adviser Lenín Rodríguez. PHOTOS: API / CRISTINA VEGA.

The legislator César Rohón said that the Christian Social Party would define its position on the legislator Ana Galarzain the ranks of the CREO, the same day as the meeting of the Assembly is held to vote for or against his removal, on the basis of a report by a multi-party committee, which proclaimed his innocent of the charge to charge "tithes" to his badociates, presented by a former adviser, which he dismissed.

The same position took the SUMA block. Guillermo Celi, of SUMA, argued that he should listen to the arguments of his colleague from CREO.

The plenary of the National Assembly will meet next week with the two reports of investigation to the legislator of CREO: the majority, who absolve him from the action, and the minority, who claims his dismissal.

Lenin Plaza, Member of Parliament PAIS Alliance, she badured that the member of CREO should be heard, but she felt that the minority report, of his co-official, the correísta Orange poppy, who asks for his dismissal "has a lot to say". For his part, his co-leader, Silvia Salgado, is betting on the dismissal of Ana Galarza.

The same criterion of independent MP Eliseo Azuero, who will insist on the discussion of the document that was delivered by Amapola Naranjo.

According to the daily El Telégrafo, which does not cite sources, the Christian Social Party and SUMA will support the departure of Galarza, for which 71 votes are needed, which meet the votes of Alianza PAIS and the Citizen Revolution block.

The CREO Court argues that Article 164 of the Organic Law of the Legislative Function, which governs the procedure of sanctioning the members of the badembly, provides that only one report shall be given to the plenary session and not two, as in the case of Galarza. (I)

[ad_2]
Source link