[ad_1]
A few days ago, line ministries of government and related organizations reached an operational agreement with the representative of the House of Peoples (HPR) on the implementation of activities planned for 2011 presence of the Prime Minister, Dr. Abiy Ahmed.
The agreements are the first of their kind in the political history of Ethiopia. Although the legislature had the power to put in place a verifiable system of checks and balances with the executive, there was no fixed and binding legal instrument that made it clear that the government was accountable to the government. electorate through the HPR.
the agreements also indicate the nature of the political system and the level of accountability of the implementing institutions vis-à-vis the law and the state legislative body. Ethiopia is pursuing a democratic and revolutionary political system that has not been borrowed or reproduced from any other country in the world. In a multiracial country like Ethiopia, the socio-economic and political unit can be achieved by ensuring diversity and accountability.
Agreements are, among other things, instruments of good financial governance by allowing signatories to use the resources allocated to them. to respond effectively to the persistent demands of the public.
The agreements clearly indicate not only the list of activities to be carried out, but also the time frames in which they must be implemented. This, on the other hand, concerns not only the rapid implementation of the activities, but also the realization of public activities based on the population in the efficiency, the quantity, the quality and the standards desired.
the main elements of the agreements that are legally binding during the next budget year.
As in many other African countries, in the past two decades, government departments and organizations have remained unpunished for the damage they have suffered on public property. the services that they failed to deliver to the public. During the previous fiscal year, some fundamental attempts were made to make the government organization accountable by submitting their case to the courts. This must continue not only after the damage, but even before the end of the exercise in the medium term.
Government agencies accomplish their tasks by deploying their own management and work staff to meet the expectations of the people. and the governments of Ethiopia. The agreements also presuppose quality services in the minimum period required without any bureaucracy.
In recent years, reports provided by various government departments and institutions are not necessarily prepared by making the necessary comparison between planned activities and their scale and rate of achievement. During their follow-up visits to various government agencies at the federal and regional levels, the members of the PRH standing committees found that what was reported to them did not correspond to what was observed in the field. [19659003] People at the federal and regional levels should be the main beneficiaries of the activities and budget on which government stakeholders have agreements. They therefore need to know the exact content of the terms and conditions of the agreements so that they can participate legally in the monitoring and evaluation of the planned activities.
The public has the right to follow the progress of projects that are underway. be implemented for the benefit of peoples. This is very important for enhancing transparency in the implementation of state-funded projects.
The signing of operational activities between HPR and line ministries is another practical demonstration of the legal relationship between the legislature and the executive. Future activity reports and mid-term evaluations all depend on legally agreed program performance mechanisms within the specified timeframe and budget allocated for program implementation.
Legitimate and organized public participation in the evaluation and evaluation of programs by government agencies is also based on the sovereign power of nations, nationalities and Ethiopian peoples guaranteed by the constitution.
Nevertheless, public participation in the monitoring and evaluation of projects conducted by public funds would also help to significantly reduce the recurrence of negative audits. reports to which the implementing organizations are expected to respond. Although the agreements provide for the following exercise, this does not mean that the audit findings, embezzlement and all reports on misconduct on service delivery systems The content of the agreements apparently should not be limited to financial and operational issues, but should also take into account negative operating problems, including nepotism, parochialism, all forms of favoritism and operational manipulations.
The signing of such documents relating to the government's planned activities in the coming year certainly defines not only the legal obligation of the signatories, but also the specific responsibilities conferred on the managers and staff members of each government organization duly covered by the agreement.
It is true that every official Obviously, his own job description naturally comes from the years of work each employee has done each year. In addition, each official must enter into specific operational agreements with the employing agency to commit to performing the tasks badigned to him, not only as a professional obligation but also as a process. justifying enumeration and rewards for outstanding artists.
A number of operational modalities and theoretical frameworks have been introduced by the government to ensure a better service delivery system including BPR, RBM, BSC and many others, but despite the government's efforts to introduce such innovations, Work performance Government organizations remained plagued by slacking, dragging, corruption, rent seeking and many threats to good governance in the public sector.
This means that sectoral ministries and concerned government institutions must first clean their own homes. they can fully engage in carrying out their operational and legal exp
It is worth noting that the government has announced that no new major project should be launched next year, but that the focus will be more on the completion of projects that have not yet been completed.
An agreement reached between the government agencies and the standing committees of the HPR will also bring about savings in terms of both the operational duration and the financing of the activities to be carried out throughout the fiscal year. It also presupposes that the budget is disbursed in a timely manner for technical ministries as well as for organizations at the federal and regional levels. If the budget is not delivered on time, this will affect not only the running time of the activities, but also the quality of the work to be done.
Finally, the purpose of agreements is to effectively facilitate responses to designated public inquiries. who have always been under the jurisdiction of the government. The badessment of the performance results made during the fiscal year will certainly become a learning process for the completion of activities defined for the remaining years of GTP II.
[ad_2]
Source link
