[ad_1]
Android OEMs are plentiful, and it's easy to find an Android phone that users will love. The Samsung Galaxy S9, the Galaxy S9 Plus and the Huawei P20 Pro are smartphones that are hard to dislike. The iPhone X has features that Apple has brought from Android, but it holds its own against them. Perhaps "surpbading" is a better word in the mind of longtime iPhone users.
There are five reasons why the iPhone X is always better than the Samsung Galaxy S9 and the Huawei P20 Pro. What are they? Keep reading to find out
Animoji and Memoji vs. 3D AR Emoji (iPhone X vs. Galaxy S9, Galaxy S9 Plus)
Agreement. I have to put this one away. The animoji of the iPhone X surpbad the 3D AR emoji of the Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus. They just look better. The 3D reproduction of the animals seems normal while the 3D emoji AR do not seem enough "3D". Samsung's emoji are numerous and customizable, but they do not go far enough to make people's appearances. What about the user who has a defining feature such as freckles? Does Emoji Galaxy S9 AR capabilities capture the user's freckles? The Memojis of Apple do the job better, again, another testimony of the capabilities of the 3D camera of the iPhone X.
There is a reason behind the high quality of animoji and memoji Emoji 3D AR: Samsung's 3D emoji are really emoji rendered in 2D. Samsung does not have a 3D camera on the Galaxy S9 or the Galaxy S9 Plus, which means that rendering "3D" is something done in the software without hardware integration. Software rendering without the necessary hardware is a shortcut that does not reach Samsung at the top. And a number of Galaxy S9 users have said that Samsung's 3D emoji AR do not even reflect their facial features in real time. Many do not even recognize the 3D AR emoji that watch them on the screen.
It boils down to the capabilities of the 3D camera, honestly. The animoji and memoji of Apple are not big in quantity, but their quality on the iPhone X is more refined. This comes back to the same argument that many have made over and over again about quantity versus quality. Now you know why Samsung wants to bring a 3D camera to the next Galaxy.
Unity vs Fragmentation (iPhone X vs Galaxy S9, Huawei P20 Pro)
The unit Apple and iOS and the fragmentation of Android is still a clbadic argument that wins a lot at iOS on the iPhone X. Apple controls both the software (iOS) and the hardware (iPhone) of its users. Apple even designs its own processors, cameras and wireless charging from the iPhone X.
With Android, OEMs manufacture hardware while Google manufactures Android software. Huawei is the hardware of Huawei P20, and Huawei even makes the "Android skin" called Emotion UI, but Android is still below all that. Samsung may have refined its user interface and renamed it "Samsung Experience", but Android still belongs to Google. If something is wrong with Android, Google must repair it, otherwise the equipment manufacturers will not be lucky.
That's what we always mean by Android fragmentation: one company is working on hardware, another on software. The iPhone X, by contrast, is manufactured by Apple from hardware to software. Apple can do something about the problems without interference from another company. Android builders will always lag behind in this area as long as they continue to use Android.
The Battle of the Cameras: how many are there?
There was a time when front camera smartphones (which some now call "selfie" cameras) and a single rear camera. Today, double cameras are all the rage. However, some Android OEMs are starting to multiply front and back cameras. Huawei is one of them, and its P20 Pro has four cameras (three at the back, one at the front).
How many cameras are enough? I can see the logic behind the dual rear cameras, but do we really need four cameras on a smartphone for a professional photography experience? Smartphones are gaining ground in professional photography these days; smartphones can now compete with DSLR cameras in photo capture. But the addition of a third rear camera to smartphones does not result in anything. And, to make matters worse, Huawei has not sold consumers on what four cameras accomplish that two or three can not. Will the Huawei P20 Pro win any photography competitions against the iPhone X? Probably not.
Huawei is not alone. Samsung plans three back-to-back cameras for the Galaxy S10 in 2019, a sign that Android builders can no longer afford to sell smartphones. They simply multiply the parts and components of smartphones to sell phones. Have double rear cameras (which have become a new trend over the past year or two) are insufficient for another rear camera to be needed? Some Android OEMs also create a dual front-end camera experience. What is the advantage of two selfie cameras? I think we are quite consumed with ourselves already.
The iPhone X notch: the origin of the influence and imitation
Some say that Essential, the company behind the essential phone, came with the notch that is present on the iPhone X, but the point is irrelevant. It is a fact that Apple is a mover and shaker in this business and that their "trend-starters" take off and influence the smartphone industry. Until Apple's notch in the iPhone X, little was bothered to make it essential. That's the iPhone X notch that has booted all the "notched" screens of Android OEMs, including Huawei with the P20 Pro.
Others are the Redmi 6 Pro, the Lenovo Z5, the Vivo Y83, the OnePlus 6, the Vivo X21, the Xiaomi Mi 8, the Huawei Honor 10, the Nokia X6, the Vivo V9 and the OPPO F7. Even Google plans to get closer to its future smartphones Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL later this year. The Android P Developer Overview is an obvious gift. Samsung has not yet yielded to the design of the notch, but imitated animoji / memoji from Apple with 3D emoji AR.
Why the notch of the iPhone X is so popular
[19659002] What's in a notch? Not much. The notch is nothing more than a practical design for sensors, cameras and speakers. Still, it has become a trend now to refer to "notched screens" by talking about Android smartphones that mimic Apple's notch. I do not consider "notch" as an innovation, but I find it discouraging that Android, with all its OEM and its potential, mimics the iPhone X notch (and the iPhone X animoji and Memoji, Samsung) and think that one OEMs that copy the notch and animoji / memoji in the future (Samsung will not be the only one to do a "me too" with 3D emoji) send a terrible message that consumers are listening: that is, "our phones are not good enough unless to imitate Apple." The Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 + are terrible phones and would have been fine without 3D AR emoji. Every Android smartphone would be better without the notch. The reason why 3D emojis and "notch" are present on Android smartphones has little to do with what consumers want and more with the "servants" OEM of Android that "kiss the ring" of King Apple whenever they unveil a smartphone. Such an inferiority complex does not make a good impression on innovative businesses
Times have changed
Unless you have lived under a rock, innovation has surpbaded Apple in the last five years .
technology. We are not in the early days of the iPhone where there were few or no direct rivals that provided an attractive smartphone to buyers. Today, Android smartphones come with a set of features that some iPhone users are dying to have. Why can OEMs not work with the success of Android instead of asking for iPhone users' approval every time an Android smartphone is unveiled? The more they look to be like Apple, the more Apple continues to dominate them in global sales. When your imitation strategy does not help you succeed, it is time to give up for something original. It's time for Android OEMs to take the slogan "Be Different" from Apple and use it against the fruit company. In a positive way.
The iPhone X keeps Apple users in his "walled garden" and away from Android
The iPhone X celebrates the tenth anniversary of the iPhone, but it also serves as a formidable strike from Apple. Its AMOLED display, wider screen and wireless charging are all strategic to the fruit company to keep its users from getting lost in the "galaxy". While Samsung has "paid tribute" to Apple over the years, Apple has also given indirect approval. to Samsung Galaxy smartphones. Until the moment Samsung started adding water and dust resistance to its range of smartphones, Apple has refused to do so – even though Sony has popularized this feature.
The iPhone X can have these imitative features of other smartphones. Only the optional iPhone users who do not want to leave iOS in the wind. For those who are heavily invested in the platform, they can have phones similar to other brands and keep everything that makes their smartphones unique (hardware and software integration Apple, iOS, 3D facial recognition, etc.). For iPhone fans, even the 'me too' nature of the iPhone X is another factor in its favor.
The above discussions are all controversial, I'm sure, but what is your opinion on the iPhone X? Think that the Samsung Galaxy S9 / S9 Plus or the Huawei P20 Pro is better than the iPhone X?
In Stores
[ad_2]
Source link
