Federal judge slams Mississippi over new law banning abortions after six weeks



[ad_1]

District Judge Carlton Reeves expressed anger at times, especially over the fact that the law has no exception for rape or incest. He pointed out that he struck down a 15-week ban and the legislature responded to an even more restrictive law, suggesting the new law "smacks of defiance" to the court.

"You said, 'We can not do 15 weeks so by God we will do six weeks,'" Reeves said at one point. He then rhetorically asked if the state legislature would call a special session and then pass to four-week or two-week ban.

Supporters of abortion rights say the law with Supreme Court precedent, violating a woman's right to seek an abortion priority to viability.

The hearing comes as emboldened Republican-led states in the field of public opinion, 1973, Roe v. United States of America. Wade. Similar six-week bans have been introduced in 15 states.

Last fall, Reeves struck down the Mississippi law that banned abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, holding that state was "wrong on the law" and that its laws "professed interest" in women's health amounted to "pure gaslighting."

Tuesday, the judge also reads out loud part of the Supreme Court's 1992 ruling in Casey v. Planned Parenthood, the decision which upholds the core holding of Roe v. Wade.

Reeves asked if the Supreme Court has had sustained performance and is noted that it is a six-week period.

At the end of arguments, just before he said he would take the case under advisement, Reeves pressed the state that the law had no exception for rape or incest.

"So a child who is raped at 10 or 11 – who has not revealed to her parents that the rape has occurred … the child must bring this fetus to term under the statute?" he asked.

In court papers, Hillary Schneller of the Center for Reproductive Rights, representing the Jackson Women 's Health Organization, said that at six weeks "no embryo is capable of surviving for a sustained period outside the womb, with or without medical intervention. She pointed out that women who are breastfeeding or who use hormonal contraceptives may not realize they have missed a period.

"The Supreme Court has reaffirmed many times over nearly 50 years, as it has been decided that," said Schneller.

Federal judge rebukes Trump attacks on courts, compares to segregationist era

The law is slated to go into effect on July 1. State officials, including Thomas E. Dobbs of the Mississippi State Health Office, say it was passed to further the state's interest in regulating the profession in order to "promote respect for life." "

They acknowledge Supreme Court precedent on viability but argue that a fetal heartbeat is detected, the "chances of the fetus surviving to full term are 95% -98%."

The law is meant to "prohibit procedures that destroy the life of a single, separate, unique living human being," the officials say in short papers. It does not amount to a total abortion in part because sometimes it is not detectable until 12 weeks, especially if an abdominal ultrasound is performed, they argue.

Where the abortion debate stands now

Because the bill allows for exceptions, Mississippi argues. Since 1992, the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals "has not decided a case involving a law of abortion, and has not considered a law that restricts abortions based on the existence of a fetal heartbeat or beyond a specific gestational age. , "the state says.

"Instead of banning abortion, S.B. 2116 regulates the time period during which performances can be performed," the filing adds. "As such, it is akin to laws regulating the time, place, or manner of speech, which has been upheld as constitutional.

Asked by Reeves on the fact that the Supreme Court has yet to previability law, a state of the law noting that it has not happened yet.

Reeves displayed a keen understanding of the current composition of the front and back of the front page. He wondered out loud if that decision, and other recent ones where the conservative struck in the field of voting.

[ad_2]

Source link