[ad_1]
FFrom tax policy to Amazon's job creation, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., Is in the process of forging a reputation for being wrong at almost everything. We can now add a campaign finance law to the list.
In what has become the most-watched Twitter video of all politicians, Ocasio-Cortez recently played a "game of corruption" at a House Watch Committee hearing to demand a "reform of funding for campaigns. " In his words"We have a fundamentally broken system. We have these influences in this body, which means that they are here, in our committee, shaping the questions that are being asked to you just now. "
The heart of Ocasio-Cortez's position, explained on its campaign website, is that "the richest people in this country [have] the opportunity to buy the US government ", which" discourages those who are less privileged to consider a race ".
Ocasio-Cortez is a crusade against "special interests", but each interest is "special" for those who care. This is also true of the pro-abortion groups that publicly support Ocasio-Cortez and the unions that fund its campaign committee. They are just "special interests" she likes, unlike, for example, 25,000 New Yorkers who will not find work at Amazon, thanks in part to her work.
Ironically, Ocasio-Cortez's own story contradicts his story that the "little guy" can not win. A former bartender from the working class, Ocasio-Cortez defeated former representative Joe Crowley after being overtaken by an 18-to-1 lead. A long-time outgoing member who had not faced a main opponent since 2004, Crowley was the embodiment of a deep-rooted insider in the country. Yet he always lost (just like Eric Cantor before him).
Ocasio-Cortez is now one of the Democratic Party's brightest stars, making the cover of Vanity Fair and attracting a $ 10 million Netflix documentary, just months after serving drinks in New York. His story proves that money does not win elections, it is charismatic politicians and popular ideas. If you really want to support a socialist candidate, no billionaire boogeyman can stop you. If you do not, then you choose someone else. There is no money that allows voters to vote for someone they do not want to vote for. Just ask Jeb! Or ask Hillary Clinton, who has overtaken President Trump 2 to 1.
Money is simply a tool used to spread ideas to the public. Ocasio-Cortez knows this, having raised more than $ 2 million and spent nearly $ 1.7 million in his general election without facing real competition. She spent these funds spreading her socialist ideas to the American people, through advertising, grassroots awareness campaigns, and other forms of political speech – the same speech, Ocasio-Cortez, would deny it. to others in the name of "campaign finance reform".
The public image of Ocasio-Cortez is as a woman of the people, take «Business cap [from] the fossil fuel industry, the health care industry, large pharmaceutical companies "and the call for lobbyists to" write laws "in their favor.
It's a hypocrite. The same "failed system" has worked remarkably well and makes re-election more enjoyable every day. It's the same Ocasio-Cortez that has received more than $ 60,000 from lawyers and lobbyists and an additional $ 23,450 from the health sector. Add over $ 90,000 in finance, insurance and real estate, and we have everything you need for smart fundraising.
Even though it has become "the fossil fuel industry" and "the big pharmaceutical industry" for lobbying Congress, Ocasio-Cortez does not seem to have the trouble of denying more than $ 46,000 in contributions from Congress. union leaders who support laws that support pro-democracy unions. I guess these are the good types of "special interests"?
When you hear about rich people buying Congress, it is unlikely that you hear about George Soros, Tom Steyer or Michael Bloomberg, who flood our political system hundreds of millions of dollars. Apparently, these interests, because they align with his own, are the right kind of "special".
Ocasio-Cortez is not alone. The leader of the Senate minority, Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Regularly urge Congress to "withdraw money from politics", while organizing fundraising galas and cocktails. Since the late 1980s, their campaign committees have raised $ 117 million ($ 90.4 million for Schumer and $ 26.5 million for Pelosi) and hundreds of millions of dollars more for the super PAC Democrats . And all of these Democrats turned a blind eye to Hillary Clinton's money laundering ploy in the US $ 84 million, 2016 election, the biggest campaign finance scandal in US history. United States.
If the system is actually "broken," the hypocrisy of the left is not meant to fix it. This is the fact that they are only fixing it themselves.
Dan Backer is a seasoned advocate, having served over 100 candidates, PAC and political organizations. He is a founding lawyer of Political.Law, a law firm specializing in campaign finance and political law based in Alexandria, Virginia.
[ad_2]
Source link