[ad_1]
The hearing will mark the first major test in court in the Trump stalemate with several ongoing investigations in Congress.
In this case, the Democratic-controlled House Oversight Committee summoned the Mazars USA accounting firm for all financial statements, communications and other documents related to Trump, a handful of its companies and its 2011 foundation to 2018.
Trump's personal legal team then sued Mazars to stop the subpoena, prompting the Chamber to intervene in court to plead in favor of his request for an investigation.
The case will weigh in on the breadth of congressional authority and on the president's claims of privacy – in a court system that generally abstains from the protection of privacy. violate congressional investigations, including subpoenas.
All about timing
In this case, the timing can be everything.
Until now, the president's legal team has stated that Judge Amit Mehta was acting too fast. Even if the Trump team was ultimately to lose the case, the federal courts could be used to suspend the summons for months, potentially after the 2020 elections.
Mehta, of the US District Court in Washington, said last week that he wanted to hold a full hearing on the subpoena on Tuesday, which would have essentially speeded up the resolution of the Trump litigation to a resolution in Washington. level of the court of first instance. But the president's lawyers said they were not being treated fairly by a court and wanted to either clarify the issues before the court this week, or cancel the hearing in absolute terms.
Mehta refused to cancel Tuesday's arguments. He will hear more from Trump's team regarding court timing on Tuesday, but could also move the case forward towards a global decision.
In addition to Mazars, Trump is trying to prevent two banks from completing separate house assignments for his records.
The accounting firm and the banks have not taken sides in these cases. Instead, the Advocate General of the House argues against Trump.
Allegations of Michael Cohen
Mazars became a target of the House 's investigation after Trump' s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, accused him of rigging his fortune in an unsuccessful attempt to buy him. Buffalo Bills football team and reduce its real estate tax burden.
The Chamber argued that she had the power to summon information to appear at Trump and that she was investigating any constitutional, conflict of interest and legal issues. 39, ethics related to Trump's financial assets.
Trump 's lawyers, conversely, claim that the president is being targeted by Democrats for political reasons, namely that the subpoena has no legislative purpose. They also claim that Trump will be harmed if his accountant's personal information is exposed.
The House Financial Services and Intelligence committees are also investigating the president's finances and subpoenaing Deutsche Bank, Capitol One and other large banks.
Trump, his companies and three of his children – Ivanka, Donald Jr. and Eric – are suing in New York federal court to stop the subpoenas before these banks and will only be heard by a judge next week.
Meanwhile, a fourth House committee controlled by Democrats, Ways and Means, issued a subpoena at the end of last week for Trump's tax returns by the IRS.
[ad_2]
Source link