[ad_1]
Questioned in the media by Murielle Bolle who has just published a book, Etienne Sesmat, the captain of the gendarmerie who led the initial investigation of the Grégory affair, responds: "As former head of the investigators concerned by the slanderous attacks and the lies which mark this work and this step, I wish to officially and strongly denounce this low maneuver ".
PRECAUTIONS. "We have taken the utmost precautions to hear the young Murielle and collect her revelations. Precautions going well beyond the prescriptions of the Code of Criminal Procedure in force at that time: no audition at night, from 18:45 to 8:30 the next day; night spent in an office in a room, in a real bed, with provision of a TV; permanent presence of a female constable at her side (who did not participate in the hearings); visit of the family doctor.
His statements were repeated from November 2 in our premises to Monday, 5, face to face with the investigating judge in Epinal, outside the presence of gendarme and after having spent two days in his family.
COMPLAINT. "After the withdrawal of Murielle Bolle, we were the subject in January 1985 of a complaint for witness tampering, forgery and use of forgery and violation of the secrecy of the instruction.
This complaint was concluded by a dismissal confirmed on appeal in November 1998 and cbadation. These judicial decisions are obviously not specified in the book, evidence of the bad faith of their authors.
CONVICTIONS. "The same false accusations, on the same subject, had been previously issued by Murielle's sister, Marie-Ange Laroche, as well as by Mes Prompt and Welzer. I personally attacked and sentenced these people for "public defamation of a public official: Me Prompt in June 2008 for his book '' Affaire Grégory: justice has she said her last word? ''; Me Welzer in September 2010 (with confirmation on appeal in November 2011) for her remarks during a press conference and Marie-Ange Laroche in January 2012 for her book '' The forgotten tears of Vologne ''.
In Murielle Bolle's book, MeTeissonnière – who had defended them all three without success – was careful not to attack me head-on and took the precaution of slandering the institution and '' the gendarmes '' 'in general'.
ATTEMPTING TO SUICIDE. "Evidence of the dishonesty of this book, an enormous lie is uttered about Murielle Bolle's suicide attempt. It says that it took place after the badbadination of Bernard Laroche, at the end of March 1985. But a press article by East Republican of February 5, 1985, quotes Murielle Bolle's mother as saying that this suicide attempt occurred on the evening of November 5, 1984, the day of her brother-in-law's incarceration and incarceration. This blatant and shameless lie is characteristic of this book. "
DISHONESTY. "This book is dishonest intellectually and morally. Its purpose is to distort the course of justice, which is all the more shameful that the investigation aims to elucidate the causes and circumstances of the murder of a child of 4 years. It is an affront to honor and truth.
[ad_2]
Source link
