[ad_1]
In recent years, ELLAKTOR is living a nightmare from which he has to be directly awake, says the group's main shareholder, An. Kallitsantsis, in an interview with Kathimerini on the occasion of developments of the CHANGE4ELLAKTOR group and initiative. .
He does not seem convinced of the positive prospects of ELLAKTOR that on the condition that there is a modern administrative model and a new AC, without the participation of MM. Bobola and Koutra, who, as he says, "do not seem to share his point of view about change."
"We can not let ELLAKTOR become a Pegasus I and Dimitris Kallitsantsis can not and do not want to caress the ears of employees and shareholders, baduring them that everything is fine until the day when all of a sudden nothing will be good, as was the case with Pegasus, "notes A. Kallitsantsis.
In the interview, ELLAKTOR's main shareholder refers to the stalemate of the board and the breaking with the other major shareholders of the group, stating that "for at least two years, the board of directors of ELLAKTOR works with demarcation lines The fact that most of us have been to shareholders, sector managers and members of the Board of Directors made it possible to prioritize the strategies and the pursuit of each activity vis-à-vis the public The good of the group. "
As for the divergent views of key strategists, he says that" Mr. Koutras demanded other activities to provide liquidity to fill the gaps in the construction, Mr. Bom Olas wanted to keep the fund intact of concessions to invest, I insisted that EL.TECH. The wind must not be sold at a loss for the Group and the rest of the Council.
In the same interview, Mr. Kallitsantsis pointed out that the first priority would be the strengthening of corporate governance, the importance of which was also reflected in the Group's report on legal and regulatory issues. regulatory compliance issues in the fields of waste construction and waste management (subsidiary HELECTOR in Cyprus and EPAP in Greece).
It pleads for the commitment to reorganize the group that the l & # 39; administration badumed "why the initiative Change4Ellaktor had to publish its proposal for reorganization, restructuring and strategy to adopt or better acquire in just two days, all our proposals were ignored for two years? "
Referring to AKTOR's activity, he feels that he has an organizational and functional problem that becomes detrimental when he distances himself from the environment sure and familiar, and adds that the damage done in the Middle East and the Balkans proves that whoever oversees these activities will be harmful, it is not an attempt to trigger, it is a reality that we must stop denying and dealing, "he says.
Mr. Kallitsantsis reiterated his position against the sale of ELTEX ANEMOS, stressing that he was, is and will be" against the sale of ". activities with prospects and contribution to the Group only to finance we do loss-making activities without correcting what creates the damage, because the next day we will discuss what we can sell to meet the new liquidity needs of construction.
Finally, he never claimed that ELLAKTOR should start from construction or public works, or give up his competitive advantage in Greece, pointing out that, as part of the strategy that He proposed, he hopes to bring operating profits to a constant percentage of the best performing European companies, accounting for 3.5-5% of the turnover.
[ad_2]
Source link