[ad_1]
The Inspector General of Public Administration, Maria Papaspyrou, suggests the search for disciplinary responsibilities by the employees of the Forestry Bureau of Egaleo and Urban Planning of Elefsina, elected by the municipality of Mandra and by private engineers, in its report on the most numerous floods of Western Attica in November 2017.
The 82-page report, released today, indicates that the services involved, based both on the history and frequency of floods in the region since 2014, even though they are not Caused damage, In Egaleo's forestry, responsibilities are attributed to officials who have delayed three years to respond to the forest or not character of the region, as well as the existing maturity of studies relevant, had to speed up the implementation of projects,
quickly start flood protection. Accusations, including omissions that led to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of buildings (even industrial) in the "Sures" water course, were violated, in violation of conditions and conditions. construction restrictions in effect.
Responsibilities in Elefsina Urban Planning are accused of not being activated for the registration of arbitrary constructions along watercourses after a flood event of October 2015, and proceeded to the writing of an autopsy report of most arbitrary structures on both sides of the water courses after the holiday, ie after the deadly flood of November 15, 2017
In addition, the finding concludes that the urbanism issued legal permits for the construction of buildings even inside the creek
According to the results, the arbitrary watercourses of the region exceed 39 and are warehouses, residences, service stations, depots, playgrounds and an entertainment center [19659009] The elected representatives of the Mandra municipality are responsible for the construction of a depot and a municipal stadium in the riverbed, while private engineers are responsible for the fact that they undertook and completed the construction of the arbitrary watercourse buildings
The main conclusions of the report show that:
a) The procedures for the implementation of protective works against In any case, the floods must be short
b) The River Basin Risk Management Plan has not demonstrated the magnitude of the problem due to limited data availability or uniqueness d u phenomenon of November 15, 2017.
c) There was long-term cooperation between the departments involved, but the degree of urgency of the flood protection projects in the area did not occur. was not evaluated
d) The flooding event of November 15, 2017 created the need for immediate damage to the ancient Elefsina-Thebes national highway [19659004] e) The need to delineate watercourses in the field of reliable hydrological data collection and to update the flood risk management plan was identified
(f) In some cases there was arbitrary construction of the private sector and the public sector in the riverbed
window.fbLoaded = $ .Deferred ();
window.fbAsyncInit = function () { FB.init ({ appId: "767480436596774", xfbml: true, version: "v2.9" }); window.fbLoaded.resolve (); }
(function (d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0]; if (d.getElementById (id)) {return;} js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js" fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs); } (document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
[ad_2]
Source link