Horowitz: CDC now admits 23% of hospitalizations in June – before the leak – were vaccinated



[ad_1]

“Almost everyone who dies from the virus now is not vaccinated.”

It has been the trope of anyone with a platform or minimal power in America over the past few months. And indeed, that is what we would expect from a vaccine as effective as those our government has traditionally approved. The problem is that a new CDC analysis, coupled with Israel’s experience with declining immunity, shows that this statement is already false and will only become more evident in the weeks to come.

“Population-based hospitalization rates show that unvaccinated adults aged ≥18 years are 17 times more likely to be hospitalized than vaccinated adults,” CDC researchers concluded in a new analysis of COVID hospitalizations from the January 1 to June 30. It sounds very convincing. , but when you look at their chart on page 23, it offers a very different perspective and is a worrying sign for the weeks to come.

In the past two months, politicians have repeated to nausea that 97% of people hospitalized are not vaccinated. Maryland Governor Larry Hogan (R), who oversees one of the 13 states studied by the CDC, claimed that 100% of all deaths in June were among the unvaccinated. But this CDC analysis indicates that instead, 76.6% of hospitalizations weren’t vaccinated, and that was in June before that wave got really bad. Given the rapidly accelerating decline in immunity, curious minds would like to know what that number will look like by September.

As a stagnant percentage of efficacy against serious illnesses (they have already given up on stopping transmission), that wouldn’t be a bad record for vaccines. But given what we already know about Israel, our government needs to be honest with us about the situation. now.

Israel has already concluded that there is a “significant increase in the risk of infection in individuals who have received their last dose of vaccine for at least 146 days, especially in patients over 60 years of age.” The CDC in this study also recognized that older people – who are both more vulnerable and vaccinated earlier – made up a larger share of vaccinated hospitalizations. Again, what is the true percentage of hospitalizations due to vaccinated people, especially the elderly, right now? Unlike Israel and the UK, our government refuses to release this data, other than exaggerating with anecdotal numbers that are already contradicted by their own data from June.

According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, earlier this week, “the percentage of people fully vaccinated varies between 7% and 40%, depending on the doctor, depending on the period of time measured.” If I were a bettor, I would say the period means that the more recent it is, the higher the percentage of vaccinated.

Another important point to keep in mind is that the CDC has instructed people who have been vaccinated not to get tested under most circumstances. As such, there is a huge gap between the number of mild cases that are accidentally detected in hospitals among those that are not vaccinated (but tested automatically when presenting for surgeries or other illnesses) and those. who are vaccinated. Keep in mind that during a period of prolific spread, it is very likely that people coming to the hospital for issues unrelated to COVID will catch the virus there or have just recovered from it but can still test positive.

It is also important to note that although the CDC found a much higher rate of hospitalization among the unvaccinated, once they were hospitalized, the number and proportion of fully vaccinated people admitted to the ICU or deaths were similar to those of unvaccinated people. In addition, “the median length of stay was significantly longer in fully vaccinated individuals (median 5 days (IQR 3–8) versus 4 days (IQR 2–9), respectively.” This could be due to the fact that the cohort vaccinated is more weighted towards the elderly, but again, these are the people who needed the vaccine the most.

If it is our government’s position, as in Israel, that everyone will need a reminder, then that raises the obvious question: who says it will work even as well for the next five months as the first, and what is the cost benefit analysis, given the widespread side effects of injections and the fact that there are other early treatments available that are removed? This means that now that vaccines don’t stop symptomatic illnesses and their protection against serious illness wears off over time, we need to revisit the four most important questions:

1) What is the real extent of the side effects of the vaccine? In the VAERS system alone, there is a 98 times higher risk of dying from the COVID vaccine than from the flu vaccine, and the FDA admits in its approval letter (p. 6) that the VAERS “will not be sufficient to assess the known data. serious risks “such as myocarditis and pericarditis.

2) Once we know the vaccine is fading, why is there no concern that the leaking vaccine will create a viral immune breakout and allow the virus to become stronger and longer lasting, inducing a vicious cycle of mass vaccination and enhancement of mutually reinforcing antibody-dependent disease with each subsequent booster? This is what happened with the chicken leak vaccine that induced Marek’s disease, in which the vaccinated chickens were temporarily spared severe symptoms but carried a much higher viral load than those that did. were not vaccinated. Israel having vaccinated 80% of its adults, 25% of whom have received boosters, they now have the highest per capita case rate in the world. How does this not relate to a form of vaccine-induced viral immune breakout?

3) We are already seeing people hospitalized for COVID in Israel after the third stroke, and the data suggests that, just like with the first stroke, people are actually more vulnerable virus about a week after receiving the booster before it went off. Why are we not concerned about the recall during a time when the virus is circulating abundantly?

4) Considering the censorship of dozens of potentially life-saving preventive and early treatments with a much better safety record – from monoclonal antibodies to the bottom – isn’t that a better way forward?

On this last point, it is important to keep in mind that the “vaccine” is the only form of prevention that is sanctioned. So, by definition, those who don’t will be hospitalized more because they have no option outside of the hospital. If we were to even the score with safer and more effective treatments, we would see a very different distribution of the number of hospitals. Again, those who are vaccinated also need early treatment.

Those who say almost all COVID deaths at this point are preventable are 100% right. If we allowed and even guided all primary care physicians to prescribe their patients early and often, the virus would have been eliminated a long time ago.



[ad_2]

Source link