[ad_1]
The Vivo NEX A is the slightly cheaper version of the flagship. Equipped with the latest Snapdragon 710 from Qualcomm, the device should deliver very good performance, but at a lower price. In our performance, we will see if the Vivo NEX A is between mid-range smartphones like the Nokia 7 Plus and current smartphones such as the Sony Xperia XZ2 or Samsung Galaxy S9.
I do not know what is a ransomware
Is this also the case for you?
Go directly to section:
How to test the performance of smartphones?
We have selected several benchmarks for our tests, we run three times in a row on our test devices. We use the following benchmarks:
Using these values, we can compare smartphones to each other with the help of measurable criteria. But that's not enough: what are the reference values for if the smartphone does not respect them in everyday life? That's why we also test real-world scenarios and look at current games like Final Fantasy XV Pocket Edition, Hearthstone or PUBG
Powerful without special features
Vivo uses the latest Qualcomm SoC in NEX A: the Snapdragon 710, the first in the 700 series, which is positioned between the mid-range SoC of the 600 series and the high-end 800 series. Take a look at our comparison chart to see how the SoC in the Vivo NEX A performs compared to the SD845 and SD660.
Snapdragon 660 vs Snapdragon 710 vs Snapdragon 845
| Snapdragon 660 | Snapdragon 710 | ] Snapdragon 845 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 nm | 10 nm | 10 nm | ||
| Kyro 260 | Kyro 360 | Kyro 385 | ||
|
X12, 3x CA, 600 Mbps DL |
X15, 3x CA, 800 Mbps DL | X20, 5x AC, 1.2 Gbps DL | ||
| ] 802.11ac, 2×2 MIMO | 802.11 ac, 2×2 MIMO | Advertisement 802.11, 2×2 MIMO [19659017] Adreno 512 | Adreno 616 | Adreno 630 |
| Spectra 160 | Spectra 250 [19659015] Spectra 280 | |||
| Hexagon 680 | Hexagon 685 | Hexagon 685 | ||
| QHD, 8 Layer | QHD + 10 layers, 4K HDR reading | Ultra HD Premium | ||
| QuickCharge 4+ [19659015] QuickCharge 4+ | QuickCharge 4+ |
The most obvious reason to use the Snapdragon 710 in the Vivo NEX A is to lower the price. As an uncompromising alternative, there will also be the Vivo NEX S, which will feature Qualcomm's high-end SoC model, as well as the on-screen fingerprint sensor. According to the current conversion rate, the higher model will cost about 800 dollars to import via China
Xiaomi Mi 8 reference results
| Pixel 2 XL (Snapdragon 835) |
Huawei P20 Pro (Kirin 970) |
Galaxy S9 (Formerly Exynos 9810) |
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Snapdragon 845) |
] Vivo NEX A (Snapdragon 710) |
Nokia 7 Plus (Snapdragon 660) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench CPU Simplex [19659015] 1867 |
1920 | 3645 | 2412 | 1879 | 1634 | |
| Geekbench Processor Multicore |
6291 | 6780 [19659015] 8820 | 8420 | 5918 | 5865 | |
| 3D Marker Sling Shot ES 3.1 |
3571 | 2972 [1 9659015] 3274 | 4679 | 1827 | 1330 | |
| 3D M arch Sling Shot ES 3.0 |
4714 | 3346 | 3873 [19659015] 6140 | 2789 | 2018 | |
| 3D Marker Ice Storm Unlimited ES 2.0 |
37844 | 30602 | 38488 | 63589 19659015] 28238 | 26385 | |
| Memory of the PbadMark (RAM) |
13836 | 14087 | 24721 | 12418 | 12421 | 12495 |
| Record PbadMark (Storage) [19659015] 47759 |
64144 | 72538 | 73208 | 67656 | 49866 |
So, how does the hardware-software combination does Vivo NEX A compare to current smartphones? This is not so bad at all. It is clear that the A version of the Vivo NEX can not match the processor and graphics performance of a Galaxy S9 with Exynos 9810 and certainly can not follow the Sony Xperia XZ2 with Snapdragon 845. But at least Vivo can almost reach the The performance of a high-end smartphone from 2017. A Pixel 2 XL or a Huawei Mate 10 Pro are even faster in our benchmark test, but the Vivo NEX A is not very far behind.
You must remember that the Snapdragon 710 is also an octacore processor, but compared to the 800 series, the Kirin 970 or Exynos 9810, it works differently. Instead of combining four energy-efficient cores with four high-performance cores as usual, the Snapdragon 710 is based on a group of six ARM Cortex A55 cores that are cut for efficiency and only two ARM Cortex cores A77 high performance. From this alone, you could rank the SoC's performance in the new Vivo NEX A as "very good".
Almost no difference in daily performance!
Even though the Vivo NEX A can not keep up with the current flagships in the benchmarks, that does not mean that it's a slow smartphone. The animations on the home screen and throughout Funtouch OS, the user interface of Vivo, run smoothly and without visible jerks. Of course, you have to get used to the peculiarities at first, but it should not be taken into account in this kind of test.
The new Qualcomm SoC can provide good results in games. Even at the maximum resolution of PUBG Mobile, Final Fantasy XV Pocket Edition and similar graphics games, the gaming experience was fluid. In terms of performance reserves, the Snapdragon 710 from the Vivo NEX A has ample room to effortlessly bring the latest games to the Super AMOLED display for the next 12 to 18 months.
What do you think about Vivo NEX A? ? Is this variant enough for you, or does it have to be the S version with the best SoC from Qualcomm and a fingerprint sensor installed under the screen? Tell us what you think!
Source link
