[ad_1]
People are furious with the Oscars – again.
Less than two weeks away from the most famous evening in the film industry, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences gets a violent reaction after deciding to award four commercial breaks to try to reduce show at three o'clock
The unlucky categories at the center of the latest controversy? Makeup and hairstyle, short films and, to the dismay of many celebrities and Hollywood moviegoers, cinematography and film editing.
The announcement came out Monday in an email from group member John Bailey to members of the group. widely condemned as "fundamentally stupid decision" (actor Russell Crowe) and "a slap" (writer Christina Newland). In the email, Bailey pointed out that the show "still honors the achievements of the 24 awards" and will air the acceptance speeches of the four categories later in the show, Variety announced. He added that the full prize presentations will also be available in real time, live, which will be "a first" for the Oscars.
"We are committed to presenting a show we will all be proud of," wrote Bailey. The Academy did not respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.
Directors, filmmakers, actors, industry professionals and many fans were not rebadured and expressed their dissatisfaction Tuesday on social media and interviews.
"In the history of CINEMA, masterpieces have existed without sound, without color, without history, without actors and without music", tweeted the director Alfonso Cuaron, whose film Roma has been nominated for 10 awards, including Best Film. "No film has ever existed without CINEMAtography and without editing."
In the history of CINEMA, masterpieces have existed without sound, without color, without history, without actors and without music. No film has ever existed without CINEMAtography and without editing.
– Alfonso Cuaron (@alfonsocuaron) 12 February 2019
The sentiments of Cuaron were taken up by other Hollywood giants, such as as Academy Award winners. Guillermo del Toro and Russell Crowe, as well as Emmanuel Lubezki and Wally Pfister, winners of the Best Film Award,
"Cinematography and editing are at the heart of our profession," tweeted del Toro, winner of the Best Film Award and the best director. The shape of the water "last year." They are not inherited from a theatrical or literary tradition: they are cinema itself. "
Reposting, revised: I do not pretend to suggest which categories should appear in the Oscar night commercials, but, please: Cinematography & Editing is at the heart of our business. not inherited from a theatrical or literary tradition: they belong to the cinema itself.
– Guillermo del Toro (@RealGDT) on February 13, 2019
Crowe's answer was less measured.
The Academy removes the cinematography, editing, and make-up of the TV show?
It s'. is such a fundamentally stupid decision that I will not even bother to try to be a moron on this subject
It's too stupid for words– Russell Crowe (@russellcrowe) 12 February 2019
"This is a So basically stupid decision that I'm not even going to be I'm bothered by being a clever, "wrote Crowe, who received the 2001 Best Actor Award, on Twitter. "It's just too … stupid words."
On Instagram, Lubezki, who won the Oscar for Cinematography three years in a row for "The Revenant", "Birdman" and "Gravity", describes cinematography and editing as "the primordial components of cinema" , reported IndieWire. The decision of the Academy, Lubezki wrote, was "unfortunate".
Pfister, whose work on "Inception" earned him an Oscar in 2011, also called the Academy on Instagram.
"We do not agree with your disrespectful decision," read the text written on the image of an Oscar statue upside down. The legend of the director of photography was just as clear: "Do not give up this fight."
The announcement of Bailey did not attract the attention of the American Society of Cinematographers. In a letter to members on Tuesday, group chairman Kees van Oostrum described the move as "very regrettable," adding that "we can not tolerate this decision without protesting."
The plan to truncate the broadcast of the Oscars – an attempt to fight the decline in ratings – by awarding certain awards during commercial breaks, the public knows since its approval by the Board of Governors of the Academy in August 2018, reported the Associated Press. But it was not clear at the time what categories would be chosen.
In his email of Monday, Bailey wrote that six executive committees of the 17 sections of the Academy "generously chose" to present their awards "in this slightly modified calendar." Of these six, four were chosen, he writes.
Bailey is a member of the board of governors of the Academy and represents the branch of directors of photography, according to the Hollywood Reporter. The Los Angeles Times reported that Bailey's wife, Carol Littleton, a film editor, also sits on the board.
The e-mail then indicated that the four categories selected this year would not be permanently affected.
"years, four to six different categories can be selected for rotation, together with producers of shows," wrote Bailey. Cinematography, film editing, makeup and hairstyle, as well as live shorts will return to the show live in 2020, the email said.
Yet, many pointed out that it was foolish to create a prize-giving ceremony celebrating the event. the film will leave some of the industry's most fundamental crafts out of its live broadcast due to time constraints.
What better way to celebrate cinematographic accomplishments than not to publicly honor the work of those who make it the job of literally filming things
– Seth Rogen (@Sethrogen) 12 February 2019
The product The Hollywood peddling would not exist without cinematography, editing, hairdressing and makeup. It's absurdly stupid and disrespectful. https://t.co/aRAB58rr2c
– Matthew D & # 39; Ambrosio (@drmattdambrosio) 11 February 2019
] I made a film without cinematography or editing, just watch it: pic.twitter.com/rOzJIU5uNA
– Jaime Rebbad (@ItsJaimeHere) on February 13, 2019
]
In an interview with The Times, filmmaker Judd Apatow suggested to the Academy "to do it a great four-hour show."
"I understand the time constraints, but I think people would rather have a good show than a rushed show with fewer rewards and less entertainment, "Apatow said. "People watch three hours of" The Bachelor. "They will definitely watch four of the Oscars – just tell people that it's a frenzy."
(c) 2019, The Washington Post
[ad_2]
Source link
