[ad_1]
A Missouri jury on Thursday ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay a record $ 4.69 billion to 22 women who claimed that the company's talc-based products contain the same amount. asbestos and cause cancer of the ovary. is the largest J & J has so far faced claims that its talc products cause cancer.
The company is fighting against some 9,000 cases of talc. J & J denies both that its talc products cause cancer and that they contain asbestos. He claims that decades of studies show that his talc is safe and has managed to reverse previous talc verdicts for technical legal reasons.
Thursday's mbadive verdict at the St. Louis City Circuit Court included $ 550 million. According to an online broadcast of the Courtroom View Network trial, J & J said in a statement that the lawsuit was "fundamentally unfair" and said it would appeal the ruling
. $ 1.31, or 1 percent, to $ 126.45 in exchanges after the hours following the award of punitive damages. The jury's decision followed more than five weeks of testimony from nearly a dozen experts on both sides
Women and their families said that the use of baby powder and d & # 39; Other talcum products have caused their diseases. They allege that the company knew that its talc was contaminated with asbestos since at least the 1970s, but that it had not warned consumers of the risks involved.
Johnson & Johnson is deeply disappointed with the verdict, which is the result of a fundamentally unfair process. the company said in a statement. The company said that she remained confident that her products do not contain asbestos nor cause cancer.
"Every verdict against Johnson & Johnson in this court that went through the appeal process was reversed and the multiple errors present in this essay were worse" J & J successfully quashed the talc verdicts in the past, and the appeal courts have reported a 2017 decision of the US Supreme Court. Court Limits Cases Where Bodily Injury Proceedings May Be Filed
Of the 22 women in the St. Louis trial, 17 were from outside Missouri, a state generally considered friendly to the plaintiffs. The practice of combining plaintiffs in such jurisdictions, commonly criticized by defendants as "forum shopping", will be challenged on appeal.
Mark Lanier, Women's Lawyer, in a statement following the verdict asked J & J to remove his talc "If J & J insists on continuing to sell talc, they should report it with a serious warning "said Lanier.
Most of the lawsuits brought by J & J relate to allegations that talc has caused ovarian cancer, but a small number of cases allege that contaminated talc has caused mesothelioma, a tissue cancer. closely related to exposure to asbestos. Louis effectively combines these claims by alleging that talc contaminated with asbestos caused ovarian cancer.
Pre-talc trials resulted in verdicts of up to $ 417 million. But this verdict, pronounced in 2017 by a California jury, as well as other verdicts in Missouri, was overturned on appeal, and challenges of at least five other verdicts are pending.
The US Food and Drug Administration commissioned 2009 to 2010, including J & J. Lanier's baby powder told jurors that the agency and other laboratories as well as J & J had used imperfect badysis methods that did not correctly detect asbestos fibers.
Talc, the softest rock in the world, is a mineral closely related to asbestos and both substances may appear near the earth.
The plaintiffs claim that both can intermingle in the mining process. the carcinogenic substance. J & J denies these claims, baderting that rigorous testing and purification processes ensure that the talc is clean.
[ad_2]
Source link
