[ad_1]
We recently shared a review of Marques Brownlee’s iPhone 12 Pro Max which showed that in its tests, the larger sensor and stabilizer did not contribute to significantly better images. However, the results of other reviews do not necessarily agree.
The Verge has released their iPhone 12 Minute Video Review and shows results that make the iPhone 12 Pro Max look much better than its competition.
IPhone 12 Pro Max updates will be more noticeable in low light, as the new sensor is larger and therefore able to absorb more light than sensors on other iPhone 12 models or many other popular smartphones. like the Google Pixel 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.
“In sunlight and other bright light situations, the photos of the 12 Pro and 12 Pro Max look identical to me,” Verge says, agreeing with MKBHD’s advice. “And the photos of all the major flagships are starting to look the same.”
However, this new sensor has a higher ISO capacity than its iPhone contemporaries: the iPhone 12 Pro has a maximum ISO of 5808, while the 12 Pro Max can reach ISO 7616.
“It’s when the light gets dimmer that the 12 Pro Max starts to stand out,” the Verge continues.
In addition to the image above which shows much less noise on the iPhone 12 Pro Max, The Verge also found that in low light conditions the iPhone 12 Pro, Note 20 Ultra, and Pixel 5 all went into night mode (where the camera blends multiple exposures together to create a higher-quality image), the iPhone 12 Pro Max didn’t.
This result is in direct conflict with Brownlee’s conclusions.
In a review by photographer Austin Mann, he also reports that the iPhone 12 Pro Max produces significantly better results in low light.
“The larger sensor can pick up more candles, the larger pixel size maintains smoother grain without sacrificing detail, and the sensor-shift OIS keeps the image sharp despite my portable camera shake.” he writes.
CNET appears to be leaning more toward what MKBHD found in its review, saying that while on paper the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s specs look impressive, the real-world results weren’t particularly definitive.
“The Pro Max takes great photos in low light conditions,” CNET says. “But when you compare the photos with the classic 12 Pro, the differences aren’t immediately obvious.”
Much as Brownlee reported, CNET agrees that this result is less of a strike against the Pro Max, and more an indication of how good regular iPhone 12 cameras are.
In a review by MrWhosetheBoss, its results show notable differences between the iPhone 12 and 12 Pro, even with more light available than what other outlets have reported.
“The fact that it can process more light means it can collect a bit more information,” he says. The side-by-side example below shows a clearly different result between the iPhone 12 and 12 Pro.
What is perhaps the most interesting or confusing to take away from these multiple reviews is that different testers get different results. It’s hard to understand why Brownlee and CNET didn’t report significant differences in their images (and looking at them side-by-side, it’s hard to disagree with their findings) when the photos shared by The Verge, Mann, and WhosetheBoss show some very noticeable differences between the two cameras.
What do you think? Is there enough difference with the iPhone 12 Pro Max camera to justify its choice over other iPhone 12 models? Let us know in the comments.
[ad_2]
Source link