[ad_1]
EU lawmakers chose not to take a hard line on a redesign of EU copyright rights aimed at sharing Google, Facebook and other tech giants with publishers , broadcasters and artists. a proposal from the European Commission to take into account the growing role of online platforms. A key committee of the European Parliament later added more strength to the proposal to give more power to the European creative industries.
However, lawmakers voted Thursday against opening negotiations with European countries on the committee's recommendation. and the parliament will now have to revise the voting proposal in September before starting negotiations with EU countries that have already adopted their own position.
Lawmaker Julia Reda of the Greens Party, who led the opposition to the committee's tough approach, said: It's time to go back to the drawing board
"These plans are going to now be subject to scrutiny and a worthy public debate of this kind, "she said. Make sure that in September parliament votes for an update of the copyright rules protecting the interests of creators while protecting the rights of Internet users. "
EDiMA, whose members include Amazon EU, Apple, eBay, Facebook, Google Microsoft and Twitter welcome the vote of lawmakers, citing the dangers of censorship.
Axel Voss, who headed the parliamentary commission, criticized Internet groups for using false arguments European publishers EMMA, ENPA, EPC and NME, as well as the Society of Audiovisual Authors, were equally scathing
"Four European Parliament committees scrutinized, clarified, amended and approved the reform of European copyright law in the last two years. The creation of a fairer and more sustainable digital ecosystem for the benefit of creators, distributors and consumers has been compromised, "the publishers said in a joint statement.
The BEUC consumer group said that should be more consumer-friendly, the Internet must remain a place where consumers can freely share their own creations, opinions and ideas.European MEPs (legislators) have the opportunity to correct a very unbalanced report and to ensure that the law "The author works for both consumers and creators." 19659002] The debate merged around two points.One of them is what is called the neighboring right press publishers, which could force Google, Microsoft and others to pay publishers to post news excerpts.
The other is the download filtering Mandatory that requires online platforms such as YouTube, GitHub and Instagram to install filters to prevent users from downloading copyrighted material or requesting licenses to display content.
© Thomson Reuters 2018
<! –
->
Source link
