Why the spread of fear in the fight against HIV and AIDS is toxic

The fight against the HIV and AIDS pandemic has made some progress since 1984, when the first case was reported in Kenya.

Thanks to the awareness, the country is no longer ignorant of the disease. Many know its spread and its control mechanisms.

In addition, antiretrovirals now reach millions of people, while prevention of mother-to-child transmission has helped reduce infections in children.

However, the gains recorded over the years are progressively empty of the stigma badociated with the disease. Although a few have overcome the label of stigma, many others live in denial.

Ignoring this fact, organizations and volunteers running anti-HIV campaigns are not only ordinary, they also lack the skills to deal with such a delicate subject.

I do not know if HIV prevalence policies are designed to spread fear or inform and provide solutions, because the negative perception approach is a toxic pill that only generates one-off efforts.

First, badual intimacy is a choice. But it is the carelessness with which behaviors and badual choices are made that expose to risks.

Again, the presence of more user-friendly options such as condom use excites irresponsible behavior among badually active people.

Behavior change and good choices are essential to reversing risky commitments.

The HIV test is voluntary under the 2009 Prevention and Control of HIV and AIDS Act. This law also guarantees patients' privacy and confidentiality, as well as protecting those infected against discrimination.

In this respect, strategy proposals, like partner management systems, are unclear as to their implementation within the network, without violating the constitutional provisions.

In addition, this approach could lead to an expansion of Internet networks if it were unmasked prematurely.

The increasing prevalence of age groups is a consequence of untested political approaches. Messaging and targeting blind groups only facilitates the transfer of prevalence to another group perceived to be safer.

Public perception is essential for social engagement. If and originally, one would have to evaluate their impact to avoid boomerangs.

Incidentally, baduality is complex and difficult to mechanize. The only way out of the quagmire in motion is to strategize on less risky choices by formulating political strategies that offer solutions rather than spreading fear. The fear of contracting HIV is unfounded.

Once again, it is unfortunate to think that infected people can only be meager and in poor health, hence the need to dig deeper into related topics with the same vigor as baduality.

Let's talk about the gray areas that offer refuge to the cynics. These include the issue of discrepancy, doctor-patient confidentiality, church denominations and miracles, et cetera.