[ad_1]
Perhaps now, they will say that receiving criticism from Confindustria on the first measure adopted by the government is a badge of merit. That those, both know, are the owners. And that they are, on the contrary, on the side of the workers. People. But there is a problem, a detail that is not relevant: there is no work without business. And it is precisely from there that Confindustria rejects the decree of dignity developed by the executive Gialloverde.
"That's – explains the badociation – the first real college act of the new executive and, for that reason, it's also a very negative signal for the business world".
"As we have always argued – it continues – it is actually the companies that create the work.The rules can either encourage or discourage development processes and serve to accompany changes, including the labor market, so we need to intervene on the rules when we have to take into account these changes and, most importantly, the effects of precedents.The opposite of what happened with the decree of dignity ".
Confindustria uses the data published by Istat (at least from 2012 onwards) and highlights how these give the exact size of "a growing labor market". Growth linked primarily to "some innovations" that the government decided to dismantle. "In addition, the new rules will hardly be useful in relation to the stated objective – counterbalance precariousness – because the impact of futures contracts on the total number of employees is, in Italy, in line with the The result will be to have less work, not less precarious.It is also concerned that companies are paying the price of an interminable electoral race within the majority and that the conditions are created to divide the labor market actors, with the risk of proposing old oppositions again. "
But another crucial issue of the decree is, for Confindustria, that concerning" relocations ". "Italy is a big industrial country, the second largest manufacturing powerhouse in Europe after Germany, and it would take rules to attract investment, both domestic and foreign.The written ones, however, the investments They are likely to discourage them: let us be clear: to strike hard at the opportunistic behavior of those who engage with the state and do not maintain it is a goal we share, but the withdrawal of incentives to strike effective distraction from productive activities and employment bases from Italy is an account, on the other hand, it is to conceive of punitive rules having a broad and generic scope. "
" The only common denominator of labor and offshoring choices – concludes Confindustria – is to make the framework of rules more uncertain and unpredictable, in which Italian companies operate: the opposite of the goals of simplification and thin bureaucracy declared by the new government at the time of its creation. "
[ad_2]
Source link
