[ad_1]
On Thursday, the crisis of welcoming migrants to Germany ended with an agreement between all the allies of the German government coalition. As we have heard in recent days, there will be no "migrant camps" at the borders of Germany, but only an accelerated management of asylum applications for those who cross the borders of the country. This process will take place in ordinary police stations and no special facility will be built.
The agreement appears to sanction the downsizing of the Interior Minister and ally of Chancellor Merkel Horst Seehofer, whose threat of resigning if measures had not been taken more control Strict immigration has triggered the crisis. Seehofer is head of CSU, the party that is a close ally of Merkel's CDU: he will face local elections in Bavaria next October and has called for tougher measures against migrants to avoid losing right-wing votes.
On Monday evening, Merkel had accepted Seehofer's demands, but that did not immediately put an end to the crisis, because the Chancellor had to convince the other allies of the government, the Social Democrats of the SPD. "Once again, the SPD has only bad options," sums up the press agency Deutusche Welle . In the end, however, the new SPD leader, Andrea Nahles, reached an agreement deemed acceptable by many members of his party, getting the elimination of the agreement of each type of camp or center of detention
. The solution for dealing with asylum applications in existing structures without building new fields is the most logical. The problem reported by Seehofer, it is that in Germany arrive too many migrants who in fact should seek asylum in the European countries where they made their entry for the first time (these are the famous "secondary movements" ), these last days have been greatly diminished. A member of the SPD recalled that at the southern borders of the country, where Seehofer originally wanted to build identification centers and reject all asylum seekers, an average of only five plaintiffs Asylum per day arrives.
of the end of the crisis, something irreparable happened anyway. Anna Sauerbrey, editor of the German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel wrote that Seehofer introduced a new level of political cynicism in the country, using a minor crisis to try to gain political advantage for his party. Others accuse Seehofer of having turned a personal quarrel with Merkel into a national and international crisis. The editorialist of the popular weekly Spiegel Alexander Neubacher, wrote that in recent weeks Germany has witnessed the destruction of two of his certainties considered up to here as immutable. The first: that his football team has always been able to achieve excellent results at the World Cup. The second: that CSU, Seehofer's party allied to Merkel's CDU, has always managed to reconcile his personal interest with what is good for Germany as a whole.
According to Neubacher, Seehofer granted his personal interests and those of his faction within the CSU to dominate the good of Germany, to come into conflict with Merkel whose effects could have been very serious for the country and whose consequences, still poorly understood, will be felt for a long time. "The damage is so deep that it could not be repaired even though Seehofer and Merkel both resigned," wrote Neubacher: "The agreement between the two parties, known as the name of "the Union", guarantees for more than 60 years unprecedented stability in Germany.Now it is the story.And it is not something to celebrate, also contradictory be with the positions expressed by the CDU. "
The German crisis is also likely to have international consequences. Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said that if Germany strengthened its borders, Austria would adopt similar measures on its southern border, which largely coincides with the Italian border. The idea, in other words, is that if Germany no longer allows entry to southern migrants, then Austria will do the same by blocking the border with the EU. # 39; Italy.
It's easier said than done to do it. Completely preventing the pbadage of migrants to the Brenner borders, the main Alpine gap between Italy and Austria, would mean the restoration of border controls, in violation of the Schengen Treaty. In addition, controls would inevitably lead to difficulties and delays in crossing the border, making economic damage difficult to estimate. Austrian Transport Minister Norbert Hofer, a former presidential candidate and member of the far-right party FPÖ, has defined the restoration of controls as "disastrous" Brenner.
It is difficult to arrive at such extreme solutions and a meeting between the Ministers of the Interior of Germany, Austria and Italy should have place next week. All three (including Italian Matteo Salvini) probably know that the current is not a real crisis. If only 5 asylum seekers arrive each day at the southern border of Germany, the situation in Austria seems even less urgent. The Tyrolese police claim to have stopped at the border with Italy 65 people in January, 52 in February and 26 in March. It therefore seems unlikely that the three ministers decide to restore controls, which could cause tens of millions of euros worth of damage every month, trying to stop the crossing of their borders by a few dozen people
[ad_2]
Source link
